New research identifies 3 distinct multiple sclerosis types for personalized treatment

Research team at the University of Münster

Heinz Wiendl, Luisa Klotz and Andreas Schulte-Mecklenbeck from the University of Münster performed high-dimensional flow cytometry to describe MS in unprecedented detail CREDIT Uni MS/Wibberg.

In a transformative study published in the Journal Science Translational Medicine, an international team of researchers, led by the University of Münster and the Department of Neurology at the University Hospital of Münster, Germany, in collaboration with the German Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS), has made a significant breakthrough in the understanding and potential treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Their findings reveal the identification of three distinct immunological endophenotypes of MS, defined by specific blood immune signatures associated with different disease trajectories. This discovery opens new avenues for personalized treatment strategies, addressing the long-standing challenge of individualized treatment selection in MS therapy.

MS is a complex and unpredictable disease, affecting more than 2.8 million people worldwide. It has long been recognized for its varied clinical manifestations and progression, making effective treatment a significant challenge. Traditional treatment approaches have often been a one-size-fits-all solution, not considering the underlying distinct immunopathology in each patient.

The study, which analyzed data from over 500 early MS patients across two independent cohorts, utilized high-dimensional flow cytometry and serum proteomics to map the immune system’s complexity in unprecedented detail. The researchers’ sophisticated analysis identified three distinct immunological endophenotypes, each associated with specific disease pathways and responses to treatment.

Prof. Heinz Wiendl, one of the study’s lead authors, stated, “These findings represent a pivotal shift towards precision medicine in MS. “By understanding the individual immune system variations among patients, we can move closer to personalized treatment plans that are more effective and have fewer side effects.

The endophenotypes, named based on their primary characteristics—’inflammatory’, ‘degenerative’, and a third yet to be fully characterized—show distinct responses to common MS treatments. Notably, patients within the ‘inflammatory’ endophenotype showed limited benefit from interferon-beta treatment, suggesting that alternative therapies might be more effective for this group.

“Our study not only challenges the current treatment paradigm but also helps to provide a practical tool for clinicians to predict disease progression and treatment response,” added Prof. Luisa Klotz, co-lead author. “This could significantly improve the quality of life for individuals living with MS.”

Further, the study highlighted the potential for using these endophenotypes as markers for disease prognosis and treatment efficacy. This insight could guide the development of new therapeutic agents targeted at specific pathways within these endophenotypes.

The neurology and neuroimmunology communities have welcomed the findings as a major step forward in the fight against MS. They underscore the importance of individualized care and the potential for significantly improving treatment outcomes by tailoring therapies to the patient’s specific immune signature.