
The term “Asperger’s Syndrome” was once widely used to describe a specific set of behaviors and characteristics within the autism spectrum. However, in recent years, the autism community and medical professionals have moved away from using this term. Here are the key reasons why:
Diagnostic Clarity
One of the main reasons for the shift is the difficulty in clearly differentiating Asperger’s Syndrome from other forms of autism. The symptoms of Asperger’s often overlap significantly with those of autism, particularly with what is now known as autism Level 1, which requires minimal support. This overlap made it challenging to reliably diagnose Asperger’s as a distinct condition.
Unified Diagnosis
In 2013, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5), officially removed Asperger’s Syndrome as a separate diagnosis. Instead, it was merged into the broader category of autism. This change aimed to create a more unified and inclusive understanding of autism, recognizing that it exists on a spectrum with varying degrees of support needs.
Historical Controversy
The term “Asperger’s Syndrome” was named after Hans Asperger, an Austrian psychiatrist whose work in the 1940s identified a group of children with specific behavioral traits. However, recent research has revealed that Hans Asperger was complicit with the Nazi regime and was involved in the euthanasia of disabled children. This historical association has led many in the autism community to reject the term due to its troubling origins.
Promoting Inclusion
By moving away from the term “Asperger’s,” the autism community aims to promote greater inclusion and reduce stigma. The previous distinction between Asperger’s and other forms of autism sometimes perpetuated the misconception that autism is synonymous with low intelligence. The unified diagnosis under autism helps to emphasize that autism is a spectrum, and individuals with autism can have a wide range of abilities and support needs.
Personal Preferences
While the term “Asperger’s” is no longer used as an official diagnosis, some individuals who were previously diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome still prefer to use this terminology to describe themselves. They may identify as “Aspies” and feel a sense of community and identity with the term. However, the broader shift in language reflects a move towards a more inclusive and accurate understanding of autism.
Conclusion
The decision to retire the term “Asperger’s” and adopt a more inclusive approach to diagnosing autism reflects the evolving understanding of the autism spectrum. By recognizing the diverse experiences and needs of individuals with autism, the community can work towards greater acceptance, support, and inclusion for all.