What motivates people to eat less red meat?

New research looks at whether health risks or environmental impacts matter more
Recent research examines the relative importance of health risks versus environmental impacts.

Limiting red meat consumption is key to a sustainable and healthy diet, yet Americans are among the world’s largest consumers. A new study reveals the demographics of American adults who choose not to eat red meat and finds that environmental concerns may matter more to them than health risks.  

Researchers from Baruch College and the University of Southern California (USC) surveyed over 7,500 adults as part of the Understanding America Study, a probability-based Internet panel formed with individuals aged 18 and older.

In analyzing the survey results, the researchers discovered that only 12 per cent of participants reported not consuming red meat. Adults who indicated they did not eat red meat were more likely to have stated that they:

were female 
were 65 years of age or older 
had a college degree 
had an annual income of $60,000 or less 
had voted for Democrats or Independents (vs. Republicans), and  
self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or Asian (vs. non-Hispanic whites).  


When asked to choose their top two concerns of the past year, the non-red meat eaters were equally likely to choose “environment and climate change” or “health/healthcare.” In the analysis of survey results, environmental concerns were associated with self-reports of not eating red meat, while health concerns were not.  

“People may be more familiar with the environmental benefits of not eating red meat than with the potential health benefits,” says lead author Patrycja Sleboda, assistant professor of psychology at Baruch College in New York City.  

The authors suggest that public awareness of the environmental impacts of eating red meat may be increasing due to rising climate change concerns. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), red meat production is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and water usage. Production of meat and dairy contributes to 72-78 per cent of global food-related greenhouse gas emissions and 15 per cent of total global emissions. By eating less red meat, people can lower their own contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. 

The lack of a significant association between health concerns and red meat eating may reflect a lack of clear dietary recommendations in the United States. Studies have shown that high levels of both unprocessed red and processed meat have been associated with elevated risk for colorectal, stomach, and pancreatic cancers. The American Cancer Society recommends “limiting red and processed meat,” while the American Heart Association suggests people eat more plant-based proteins and meatless meals.