One third of the planet do not have basic sanitation say WHO. Is this a major health threat?


Is basic sanitation a human right?

Is basic sanitation a human right?

Years ago I was at a conference having a conversation with a potential client. The conversation moved on from boring market research to rather more interesting topics.

He asked me a very interesting question. Did I know what was the increase in average human lifespan from beginning to end of the Twentieth Century and why?

Well he explained that it was on average 30 years per person. And the two reasons for this he suggested were antibiotics and clean water.

So I was very interested to cast my beady eyes over a report published by the World Health Organisation, published yesterday, The UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water. Granted an uninspiring title but from a worldwide health perspective one of great importance.

I thought I’d share some of the key finds. I don’t suggest you read the stuff WHO have produced because NGOs indulging in self-justification of their own existence in an unedifying sight!

WHO states “2.5 billion men, women and children around the world lack access to basic sanitation services. About 1 billion people continue to practice open defecation. An additional 748 million people do not have ready access to an improved source of drinking-water. And hundreds of millions of people live without clean water and soap to wash their hands, facilitating the spread of diarrhoeal disease, the second leading cause of death among children under five.


Many other water-borne diseases, such as cholera, typhoid and hepatitis, are prone to explosive outbreaks. Poor sanitation and hygiene can also lead to debilitating diseases affecting scores of people in the developing world, like intestinal worms, blinding trachoma and schistosomiasis.”

So we are looking at around one third of our planet’s population which is more than concerning. This is particularly the case in rural areas. They share “While a vast majority of people who lack access to basic sanitation live in rural areas, the bulk of financing continues to benefit urban residents.”

They go on “Investments in water and sanitation yield substantial benefits for human health and development. According (their) estimates, for every dollar invested in water and sanitation, there is a $4.3 return in the form of reduced healthcare costs for individuals and society. Millions of children can be saved from premature death and illness related to malnutrition and water-borne diseases. Adults can live longer and healthier lives”.

All of which may be true but my question is how can we deliver clean water and sanitation to fellow global citizens? It is a serious question and I would be keen to hear your answers in the comments section below.

Many thanks in advance!

Ebola crisis – Frequently asked questions about the Ebola crisis from the World Health Organisation.


Ebola crisis

Ebola crisis

Yesterday the World Health Organisation shared some responses to a number of frequently asked questions they have received from journalists and members of the public about the ongoing Ebola crisis.

At PatientTalk we thought it would be useful to share these with our readers.

Are the Ebola outbreaks in Nigeria and Senegal over?

Not quite yet.

If the active surveillance for new cases that is currently in place continues, and no new cases are detected, WHO will declare the end of the outbreak of Ebola virus disease in Senegal on Friday 17 October. Likewise, Nigeria is expected to have passed through the requisite 42 days, with active surveillance for new cases in place and none detected, on Monday 20 October.


For Nigeria, WHO confirms that tracing of people known to have contact with an Ebola patient reached 100% in Lagos and 98% in Port Harcourt. In a piece of world-class epidemiological detective work, all confirmed cases in Nigeria were eventually linked back to the Liberian air traveller who introduced the virus into the country on 20 July.

The anticipated declaration by WHO that the outbreaks in these 2 countries are over will give the world some welcome news in an epidemic that elsewhere remains out of control in 3 West African nations.

In Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, new cases continue to explode in areas that looked like they were coming under control. An unusual characteristic of this epidemic is a persistent cyclical pattern of gradual dips in the number of new cases, followed by sudden flare-ups. WHO epidemiologists see no signs that the outbreaks in any of these 3 countries are coming under control.

How does WHO declare the end of an Ebola outbreak?

A WHO subcommittee on surveillance, epidemiology, and laboratory testing is responsible for establishing the date of the end of an Ebola outbreak.

The date is fixed according to rigorous epidemiological criteria that include the date when the last case with a high-risk exposure completes 21 days of close medical monitoring and tests negative for the virus.

According to WHO recommendations, health care workers who have attended patients or cleaned their rooms should be considered as “close contacts” and monitored for 21 days after the last exposure, even if their contact with a patient occurred when they were fully protected by wearing personal protective equipment.

For health care workers, the date of the “last infectious contact” is the day when the last patient in a health facility tests negative using a real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.

For WHO to declare an Ebola outbreak over, a country must pass through 42 days, with active surveillance demonstrably in place, supported by good diagnostic capacity, and with no new cases detected. Active surveillance is essential to detect chains of transmission that might otherwise remain hidden.

Incubation period

The period of 42 days, with active case-finding in place, is twice the maximum incubation period for Ebola virus disease and is considered by WHO as sufficient to generate confidence in a declaration that an Ebola outbreak has ended.

Recent studies conducted in West Africa have demonstrated that 95% of confirmed cases have an incubation period in the range of 1 to 21 days; 98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval. WHO is therefore confident that detection of no new cases, with active surveillance in place, throughout this 42-day period means that an Ebola outbreak is indeed over.

The announcement that the outbreaks are over, in line with the dates fixed by the subcommittee on surveillance, epidemiology, and laboratory testing, is made by the governments of the affected countries in close collaboration with WHO and its international partners.

WHO recommendations for testing for Ebola virus disease and confirming a case

WHO is alarmed by media reports of suspected Ebola cases imported into new countries that are said, by government officials or ministries of health, to be discarded as “negative” within hours after the suspected case enters the country.

Such rapid determination of infection status is impossible, casting grave doubts on some of the official information that is being communicated to the public and the media.
• For early detection of Ebola virus in suspected or probable cases, detection of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) or viral antigen are the recommended tests.
• Laboratory-confirmed cases must test positive for the presence of the Ebola virus, either by detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR, and/or by detection of Ebola antigen by a specific Antigen detection test, and/or by detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies directed against Ebola.
• Two negative RT-PCR test results, at least 48 hours apart, are required for a clinically asymptomatic patient to be discharged from hospital, or for a suspected Ebola case to be discarded as testing negative for the virus.
• Laboratory results should be communicated to WHO as quickly as possible, in addition to reporting under the requirements and within the timelines set out in the International Health Regulations, which are administered by WHO.

WHO recommends that the first 25 positive cases and 50 negative specimens detected by a country without a recognized national reference viral haemorrhagic fever laboratory should be sent for secondary confirmatory testing to a WHO collaborating centre, designed as specialized in the safe detection (at biosafety level IV) of viral haemorrhagic fevers.

Similarly, for countries with a national reference laboratory for viral haemorrhagic fevers, the initial positive cases should also be sent to a WHO collaborating centre for confirmation.

If results are concordant, laboratory results reported from the national reference laboratory would be accepted by WHO.
• For more information read WHO recommendations on laboratory guidance for the diagnosis of Ebola virus disease

“Risk of Ebola spreading in Europe is very low” say World Health Authority


Ebola Crisis

Ebola Crisis

We have covered the Ebola virus before but with recent developments in the USA and the European Union we think it would be useful to extend our coverage during the crisis.

We would also be very interested in finding out what your ideas are to stop the spread of the virus. That being said the World Health Organisation shared the following with us yesterday. “Sporadic cases of Ebola virus disease in Europe are unavoidable. This is due to travel between Europe and affected countries.

However, the risk of spread of Ebola in Europe is avoidable and extremely low. European countries are among the best prepared in the world to respond to viral haemorrhagic fever (VHF) including Ebola.

There is a risk of accidental contamination for people exposed to Ebola patients: this risk can be and must be mitigated with strict infection control measures. Health care workers are on the frontline of the Ebola fight and they are those most at risk of infection. They need to be protected and supported by all means.

All countries have protocols and procedures that must be implemented when a case is suspected and it is important that these are followed diligently. WHO is, as always, ready to provide help and support where requested.”

The latest edition of the Ebola Response Roadmap Situation Report was published yesterday. You can read it here.


British Red Cross launch Ebola Outbreak Appeal

We would like to share this recent news from the Red Cross website and hope you will share with your family and friends.

Due to constraints of time we are quoting directly from the Red Cross site:

Red Cross Ebola Appeal

Red Cross Ebola Appeal

Red Cross workers are “stretched to the limit” as the Ebola outbreak gets worse.

More than 1,900 people have now died from the virulent disease, according to the World Health Organisation.

The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), which is working across West Africa, is increasing its relief effort, but it has only 62 per cent of the funds needed to fight the epidemic.

The British Red Cross has launched an emergency Ebola Outbreak Appeal.

Together with the IFRC, we are completing construction of an isolation facility in Kenema, Sierra Leone. The new facility will ease overcrowding in other health facilities and help save lives.

Funding shortfall

The outbreak, which is the worst in history, has hit five countries in West Africa: Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Senegal.

Ben Webster, British Red Cross disaster response manager, said: “It is not an overstatement to say that this outbreak is stretching our capacity in terms of funding and personnel.

“We are seeking as much support as possible from the international community, the corporate world and the public.”

National Red Cross Societies in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia have trained 1,800 volunteers to help fight the Ebola outbreak.

Urgent action

Elhadj As Sy, the new secretary general of the IFRC, recently visited Sierra Leone and Guinea.

“In recent months, Red Cross volunteers have been working hard, assisting with dead body management, tracing those who had been in contact with patients, providing psychological support and conducting preventive education at community level.

“Their capacity is stretched to the limit, and they are literally exhausted.

“Fear, misconceptions and stigmatization fuel a vicious cycle that hampers an effective response at community level. This cycle can only be broken with a sustained mobilization from us all, in close collaboration with affected communities.”

Mr Sy also supported calls for greater intervention from the international community.

“The IFRC fully supports – and echoes – the call from Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) for the international community to urgently deploy bio-disaster facilities to the region to respond effectively to the epidemic,” he said.

The Ebola outbreak began in Guinea in March. It has a fatality rate of about 50 per cent.

Please donate if you can to this important cause!

Glasgow asks world to ‘Think Again’ about hepatitis – Glasgow takes centre stage in bid to raise awareness of hepatitis via world’s largest tweet wall


World Hepatitis Day 2014 Tweet wall in action

World Hepatitis Day 2014 Tweet wall in action

In recognition of World Hepatitis Day on 28 July 2014, the world’s largest tweet wall was erected in the heart of Glasgow, St Enoch Square, to raise awareness about viral hepatitis and the barriers faced by people living with the disease.

The interactive tweet wall was created to raise awareness amongst the Scottish public and the thousands of people attending the Commonwealth Games. It displayed bricks showing negative aspects of viral hepatitis that people living with the disease face every day. Every tweet and text message sent using the hashtag #thinkhepatitis turned a negative statement into a positive message of support, encouraging people to think again about hepatitis.

“We are very excited to be celebrating World Hepatitis Day at the Commonwealth Games this year,” said Charles Gore, President of the World Hepatitis Alliance. Viral hepatitis rarely gets the visibility it deserves despite killing 1.5 million people every year, the same number as HIV/AIDS.


Presence at such a major international event is therefore crucial to raising awareness on the global stage and challenging preconceptions about viral hepatitis. What’s more, Scotland is one of only a handful of countries worldwide with a comprehensive strategy for tackling all aspects of viral hepatitis. We are proud to be recognising that achievement by celebrating World Hepatitis Day here in Glasgow.”

The event was hosted by the World Hepatitis Alliance, in partnership with the World Health Organisation (WHO), the Scottish Government and local patient groups, in order to raise awareness of hepatitis in Scotland and across the globe to improve prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

World Hepatitis Day is one of only four official disease-specific world health days recognised by WHO.

Speaking about the impact of this year’s World Hepatitis Day campaign, Stefan Wiktor, team lead for WHO Global Hepatitis Programme, who attended the event in Glasgow, commented: “Raising awareness about viral hepatitis is the first step to increasing action against this disease. By spreading its message in countries around the world, the ‘Hepatitis: Think Again” campaign will help to build on the growing momentum to fight this pandemic.”

You can watch the video of the event here and find out more about this innovative use of social media in healthcare!