Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus – what are the symptoms of an MRSA infection?

The symptoms of an MRSA infection

The symptoms of an MRSA infection

The symptoms of an MRSA infection will depend on what part of the body is infected.

Skin and soft tissue MRSA infections

If MRSA infects the skin, it can result in a wound infection, boil or abscess.

If it infects the deeper layers of skin, it’s known as cellulitis.

Typical symptoms are:

redness

swelling

tenderness

pain

a discharge of pus

Some people have additional symptoms, such as a high temperature (fever) and a general feeling of being unwell.

These infections can also be caused by bacteria other than MRSA, so having the symptoms above doesn’t necessarily mean you have MRSA.

Invasive MRSA infections

If the MRSA bacteria penetrate deeper inside your body or into your blood, they can cause a more serious, invasive infection.

Signs of an invasive infection include:

a high temperature of 38C (100.4F) or above

chills

generally feeling unwell

dizziness

confusion

muscle aches and pains

pain, swelling and tenderness in the affected body part

Examples of invasive MRSA infections include:

blood poisoning (sepsis) – which could lead to septic shock, where your blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level

urinary tract infection (UTI) – infection of the tubes through which urine passes

endocarditis – infection of the heart valves

pneumonia – a lung infection

septic bursitis – inflammation of a fluid-filled sac that forms under the skin (usually over a joint)

septic arthritis – a joint infection

osteomyelitis – a bone infection

Click on the links above for the specific symptoms of these infections.

Are we too reliant on on antibiotics? Find out in our interview with Dr Martin Duerden.

Dr Martin Duerden

Dr Martin Duerden

When faced with a cold or sore throat are we too ready to reach for antibiotics as a prefered treatment? What are the alternatives? How effective are they?

PatientTalk.Org interviewed Dr Martin Duerden , a UK based primary care physician, university lecturer, and Clinical Advisor in prescribing for the UK Royal College of General Practitioners.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- It is estimated that 1.6 million unnecessarily antibiotic prescriptions are issued each year in the UK. This survey of pharmacy staff sees the vast majority say there needs to be improved awareness of unnecessarily antibiotic use especially in upper respiratory tract infections such as sore throats and colds. So Dr Martin what do antibiotics actually do?

DR DUERDEN- Well antibiotics are drugs that either kill bacteria or stop them multiplying and bacteria can invade your body and they help to prevent that happening. They have to be used alongside your immune system and generally people who are fit and healthy antibiotics aren’t necessary for most types of infections because your immune system deals with those infections. What this survey n showed was that for things like respiratory tract infections sore throats, coughs and colds, there really isn’t a need to go see your GP and 90% of the pharmacy staff questioned felt that patients were going along to their GP or felt that they needed antibiotics when those weren’t necessary.

The reason why they are not necessary is because they are caused by viruses and viruses do not respond to antibiotic. It makes no difference. Sometimes you get secondary infections related to the virus and that’s where antibiotics sometimes have a place but for the vast majority of coughs, colds and sore throats there’s no need to have an antibiotic. The problem is we have got used to having them. We tend to go see our GP. We tend to expect them and the GP unfortunately finds it very difficult, sometimes the only way, the best way, well they feel the easier way deal with it is to issue a prescription but that is the wrong way.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- Is there really a risk of superbugs?

DR DUERDEN- It’s a real risk and that is part of the message we are trying to get across. Today is European Antibiotic Awareness Day and what we are trying to raise is that we must campaign against unnecessary antibiotic use and the reason for that is because the more antibiotics we use the more bacteria becomes resistant to those drugs. Bacteria are very clever things and they develop resistance and we over use them we are going to run out of them and if we run out of them then simple things that we thought were curable will no longer be curable things like pneumonia, things like meningitis, will have to change the way we do modern medicine. So people won’t be able to have hip operations or knee operation. They might not be able to have chemotherapy for cancer. They may not be able to have organ transplants simply because we won’t have an antibiotic to use in that context. This is a real threat we really do have to stop unnecessary use and conserve the antibiotics we have got so they don’t develop antibiotic resistance.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- How effective are antibiotics against infections like MRSA?

DR DUERDEN- At the moment we are quite lucky that we can treat a lot of MRSA. That is Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Multiple Staphylococcus. MRSA in the UK has become less of an issue in the last decade or so because we have developed very good techniques for infection control processes within hospitals. That is rigorous attention to washing your hands and keeping things as clean as possible. Now the catch is if we do have to treat those bugs at the moment we have to use drugs that themselves are unusual, last resort drugs they tend to have toxic effects and they can be problematic. The problem is that MRSA indicates those bugs that used to respond to simple penicillin antibiotics no longer respond to those simple antibiotics we have to use to those more difficult ones. There is another point there that the reason that resistance is such a challenge is that we are running out of antibiotics. No new classes of antibiotics have been developed in the last couple of decades and if we don’t have new antibiotics coming along then sooner or later these new infections will become really troublesome.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- What are the alternatives to antibiotics and how would they work?

DR DUERDEN- Well the main place for using those alternatives is when you have self-limiting cough or cold or sore throat and they are highly effective. They are much more effective than antibiotics which really make no difference in that context so for the vast majority of people who are relatively healthy if they have got a cough or a cold or a sore throat they really should treat themselves or go to their pharmacy and get interventions that can be used to relieve their symptoms. They should not think they need an antibiotic. If they think they need advice on how best to manage the problem then they should go to their community pharmacist who can advise them what systemic interventions can be used but they can also advise them in the very unusual instances where they might need to go and see their doctor. They will direct them to their doctor and I think that is a much better to deal with this issue. So the alternatives are things like pain killers which will levitate the aches and pains of having a cough, cold or sore throat. It will also help reduce the fever and you can also use things like cough medicines and anti-septic lozenges are very good at soothing a sore throat so those very simple interventions are much better than thinking or believing an antibiotic is necessary. Antibiotics don’t work. They cause side effects in those instances and they should only be used if they are strictly necessary.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- So as it stands why is the medical profession so poor at providing alternatives?

DR DUERDEN- I think that is a really complicated issue and its developed over several decades really since antibiotics first came along in 1950 and at that time antibiotics were lifesaving and there was this real view that antibiotics had a really important place and they did at that stage but as time has gone along we’ve become almost dependent on them since we rely on antibiotics. In most instances they are not necessary so patient experience has been that when they have these problems they get an antibiotic. Patients also believe that there should be a cure for all ill’s and modern medicine seems to suggest that might be the case but the problem is viruses do not respond to that treatment and there isn’t any treatment that will help to affect the virus and when patients turn up at the GP surgery, GP’s are going to be very busy. They tend to be nice people. They don’t like confronting their patients and they tend to be rather cautious. It seems reasonable to give a patient any antibiotic in that instance and in the past it’s been felt that antibiotics are harmless but antibiotics are not harmless. The reasons I’ve just described they cause resistance and if we give an antibiotic to one person then we are scuppering the chances of treating future people so it’s really important that message gets across. Also, antibiotics, if you give them to people with self-limiting conditions they cause more harm than benefits. They cause things like diarrhoea. They can cause nausea and vomiting. They can cause a rash and adverse effects can be more troublesome so they are not harmless and we really need to change both what GP’s do in terms of prescribing them but how patients and the public if you like, relate to antibiotics. They should not see them as something that can be used for self-limiting infections. In general they have to be preserved for severe infections and for times when antibiotics are strictly necessary.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- Do you think Med Ed could play a role?

DR DUERDEN- I think it’s really important, Medical Education is all part of this and certainly there is quite a lot of evidence. There was a good research project and published paper from Cardiff University a few years ago which showed that you can improve the ways that GP’s communicate with patients and provide the right kind of information to patients to help make a decision not to use antibiotics and to avoid confrontation and so I think there is a lot of work that needs to be done with prescribers to improve our understanding of antibiotics but also to improve our communication of the risks and benefits of using antibiotics. I think there is also a really important role for education with pharmacy staff as well although pharmacy staff are generally well trained but we can provide things like decision aids information for community pharmacists which they themselves can use with patients to help convey some of the problems that I’ve been describing to you.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- Regarding the research what methodology was used?

DR DUERDEN- Well it was simple survey of pharmacy staff. Two thirds of the people questioned, and they were 143 pharmacy staff questioned, two thirds of those people were pharmacists and basically it was asking them their opinion of antibiotic was and how they should be used. It was clear from that research that they felt the understanding of antibiotic resistance and overuse of antibiotics had not really got across to the general public and we needed to improve on that. They strongly believed, 58% of those asked, felt we should always try systemic treatments before using antibiotics. Pharmacists themselves are well switched onto this message and really do need to harness their role within this conundrum so the message is that as much as possible most patients do not need to go see their GP or their out of hours service or their A&E department. What they should be doing is either treating themselves, maybe reading up on information from things like the internet. NHS Choices have some fantastic information. If they feel that they need further advice they should go talk to their pharmacist and the pharmacist can always advise if necessary that the patient then goes and see the GP but you shouldn’t go straight to your GP with these problems. We all have coughs and colds we know they get better. We know we shouldn’t be expecting a quick fix.

Background

The interview took part on European Antibiotic Awareness Day.

• It is estimated that 1.6 million unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions are issued each year in the UK2
• Survey of pharmacy staff sees vast majority say there needs to be improved awareness of unnecessary antibiotic use especially in relation to upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) such as sore throats and colds 1
• Over a third (35%) of those surveyed claim the majority of their customers seek antibiotics as a ‘go to’ treatment for URTIs before seeking advice from their pharmacy 1
More than 90% of pharmacy staff questioned believe there is a need for improved awareness of unnecessary antibiotic use 1

That’s according to new research which also saw over half (59%) say alternative options for symptomatic relief of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), such as sore throats and cold and flu, should always be tried before antibiotics. 1

Despite this, only a third (38%) of the pharmacy staff talk to their customers about alternative options for symptomatic relief for URTIs.1

It is estimated that 1.6 million unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions are issued each year in the UK.2

For pharmacy staff, recommending non-antibiotic treatment for URTIs is a challenge. Once antibiotics have been prescribed by GPs previously, pharmacy staff understandably find it difficult to convince patients that symptomatic relief is a credible and effective treatment option – and an alternative to antibiotics.

Those surveyed also showed a hesitance in questioning the GP’s assessment, 11% would advise customers that their GP knows best.1 Many patients also see antibiotics as the best solution: over a third (35%) of those surveyed claim the majority of their customers seek antibiotics as a ‘go to’ treatment for URTIs before seeking advice from their pharmacy.1

In the majority of patients, URTIs are of viral aetiology and do not benefit from antibiotics. According to Global Respiratory Infection Partnership (GRIP), antibiotics will not relieve the symptoms of most colds, sore throats, earaches or coughs. In most cases symptomatic treatments are effective and more appropriate at providing symptomatic relief.

References:
1. Survey of 143 pharmacy staff. One in three respondents work in a single shop independent or a small chain of five or fewer branches. Strategic Development Resources Ltd. October 2014
2. Professor Dame Sally Davies. Antimicrobial resistance – why the irresponsible use of antibiotics in agriculture must stop, 2014
3. Arroll B, Kenealy T. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3) CD000247.
4. Van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:490–497.
5. Hildreth CJ, et al. JAMA. 2009;302:816.
6. NICE Clinical Guideline 69. 2008. Accessed 02 April 2013. Link: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG69/NICEGuidance. P13
7. Benrijom SL et al. Clin Drug Invest 2001;21:183-93

PVL-MSSA ! Find out about high risks activities which could lead to this skin infection


MSSA

MSSA

An investigation at a rugby club into a serious infection which usually causes boils, abscesses and carbuncles found that some spread among the players may have been caused by the sharing of towels and razors or the same ice bath. The work is being presented at PHE’s annual conference this week.

The skin condition is called PVL-MSSA. This is a strain of Staphyloccocus aureus (SA) bacteria known as Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) which produces a toxin known as Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL).

You can find out more about Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus or MSRA here.

Most active infections present as recurrent boils and abscesses but it can lead to serious infections which can cause the skin and tissues to die (necrotising fasciitis), and may be life threatening.

Rugby is a well-recognised sport for PVL infection (as is wrestling) as the close contact and ‘turf burns’ from artificial grass can abrade the skin allowing the bacteria to multiply and get into the body.

Between August 2013 and February 2014 the PHE team in the South Midlands carried out an investigation into cases of PVL-MSSA, which included a questionnaire completed by players and staff followed by swabbing to detect the presence of PVL-MSSA bacteria.

In total four cases with an identical strain of PVL MSSA were identified, suggesting transmission within this setting. Two cases of active PVL infection with an identical strain of bacteria were found together with a positive result for colonisation (bacteria on the skin but no active infection) in a member of staff. A further case of PVL-MSSA wound infection was identified a week after the investigation had concluded in a player who had not attended the screening in February 2014.

Out of 59 people who responded to the questionnaire in February 2014, the results were as follows:



Regularly share towels 11 people (19 per cent)
Regularly share razors 6 people (10 per cent)
Regularly share clothing 3 people (5 per cent)
Use a cold bath after game/training 22 people (37 per cent)
Suffered any skin conditions in the last year 17 people (29 per cent)
Suffered from any other infections in the last year 11 people (19 per cent)

Dr Deepti Kumar, a Consultant in Communicable Disease Control at PHE said: “PVL-MSSA can be a very serious infection and any positive result either for colonisation or active infection will require appropriate medical treatment not just of the patient but also of their close contacts or family. Because it can spread easily it is important to ensure that the correct procedures are in place to limit the spread of the bacteria.

“The investigation identified a number of high risk practices among the players which increase their chances of getting an infection, such as sharing towels and razors, and sharing ice baths with their fellow team members. We would urge any sportsperson who plays a sport where cuts and grazes are commonplace to practice good hygiene and not share any item with fellow team members to reduce their risk of developing an infection.”

1. Four cases of PVL infection with an identical strain linked to the Club were identified over a period of 8 months.

2. In the first round of screening in December 2013 55 players and 34 staff completed questionnaires. The club medical team took swabs from 13 players and staff in total.

3. In December 2013 nine staff and nine players were swabbed and of these 5 (three staff and two players) were reported as MSSA positive but only one was positive for PVL MSSA.

4. In February 2014 swabs were taken from 59 players and staff and of these 21 (36 per cent) were positive for MSSA. They were all negative for PVL-MSSA.

5. Many people carry strains of SA on their skin and can pass the bacteria to others by direct contact. Those who carry the bacteria on their skin without any signs of infection are said to be ‘colonised’ with the bacteria.

6. PHE data show that there are between 1,200-1,500 cases of PVL-MSSA nationally each year.

MRSA Infections- Are you concerned about MRSA in hospitals and the community? What is your experience with MRSA?


Welcome to our post looking into the contraction of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infections.  MRSA is a bacterial infection that is resistant to a number of commonly used

Pills and Medication

Antibiotics

antibiotics. Which means it can be more difficult to treat than some other bacterial infections.

While it is a common bacteria if it breaks through the skin it can be very dangerous – potentially fatal.  This can lead to blood poisoning and endocarditis (which is an infection of the lining of the heart).  Urinary tract infections may also occur.

Since MRSA was discovered in the early sixties it has spread from medical facilities such as hospitals and now can be acquired in community settings as well.   Often called a Superbug because of its resistance to antibiotics it has been a regular topic in the media.

We are interested in finding our more about the experiences of people who have contracted MRSA.  It would be great if you could tell your MRSA story or indeed the story of being a family member of a person who has contracted MRSA.

  • Was the infection caught in a hospital or acquired in the community (often call CA-MRSA)?
  • Did media coverage have any effect of your view of possible infection prior to contracting MRSA?
  • Has enough been done to combat and prevent MRSA in hospitals?  Could healthcare professionals do more?
  • Do you feel that more help should be available to monitor / pre-empt MRSA?
  • Is enough done to prevent/and or treat MRSA infection patients once they have left hospital?

 

That being said we are interested in every aspect of your MRSA story so please feel free to contribute your thoughts.  Also do feel free to make any suggestions as to useful MRSA patient resources and share them with other readers.

Thanks in advance.