“Almost 99% of autistic adults are not receiving public employment services.”

Employment Services Graphic

Only 1.1% of autistic adults who needed employment services received them in 2016, according to the Policy Impact Project in the A.J. Drexel Autism Institute’s Policy and Analytics Center.

Between 2008 and 2016, a new study from Drexel University’s A.J. Drexel Autism Institute found that an estimated 1.98 million autistic adults, representing 99% of those who likely needed employment services, did not receive support through Medicaid or the Vocational Rehabilitation Administration.

The study, recently published in The Milbank Quarterly, examined data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services as well as the Department of Education’s Rehabilitation Services Administration. The researchers analyzed the distribution of employment services among individuals with autism and those with intellectual disabilities.

“Employment is a crucial factor affecting the health and well-being of the approximately 5.4 million autistic adults in the United States, just as it is for individuals without disabilities,” stated Anne Roux, a research scientist and director at the Policy Impact Project in the Autism Institute’s Policy and Analytics Center (PAC), who is the lead author of the study.

In both Vocational Rehabilitation and Medicaid programs, the research team found that only 1.1% of working-age autistic adults who potentially need employment services are getting them. In 2016, around 4,200 autistic people were receiving services through Medicaid waivers, while nearly 18,000 were receiving Vocational Rehabilitation services.

Two employment services, Medicaid and Vocational Rehabilitation, offer different types of support for autistic adults. Medicaid provides long-term employment services, while Vocational Rehabilitation offers short-term services. However, between 2008 and 2016, Vocational Rehabilitation served eight times as many autistic individuals as Medicaid did. The difference in the number of people with intellectual disabilities receiving services from Vocational Rehabilitation compared to Medicaid was smaller, with three times as many individuals served by Vocational Rehabilitation.

Medicaid funded employment services for fewer autistic individuals, but its spending on employment services for autistic adults was more than double that of Vocational Rehabilitation.

However, total spending on employment services for autistic adults decreased by almost 30% among Medicaid enrollees but increased by nearly 400% among Vocational Rehabilitation service users over the same period.

“Public spending as a whole is going toward short-term employment services, even though many autistic individuals are likely to need some level of flexible, longer-term support throughout their working years,” said Roux.

The research team was  surprised by the gaps in the capacity to provide public employment services.

“It is difficult for me to wrap my brain around exactly how few people are receiving public employment services,” said Roux.

Roux pointed out that autistic individuals do not have guaranteed access to support services for functioning and wellbeing after they finish high school. When special education services end, there is a “services cliff” – a gap in service eligibility – because there is no federal law that allows autistic adults to continue receiving the services and support they may need throughout their lives. The “services cliff” is worsened by very limited access to employment services. Even when services are available, the process of accessing them is often very challenging, preventing individuals from reaching their potential and trapping them in a life of poverty and increased healthcare costs.

The research team aimed to explore how employment services for autistic adults are funded in the U.S. However, they found that there is no publicly available data that tracks employment services for autistic individuals within the Medicaid and Vocational Rehabilitation systems.

“Therefore, the significant gaps in our ability to provide these public services are often only recognized through the stories of individuals who continually report that they cannot access the assistance they require, or by individuals seeking to improve the delivery of these services,” stated Lindsay Shea, DrPH, leader of PAC and the principal investigator for this research. “These findings validate those experiences and underscore the importance of funding for these services.”

As a result, the research team suggests that there is an urgent need for policy changes to enhance the employment services systems in the U.S.

Treatment at the first signs of Multiple Sclerosis may reduce the risk of disability later.

Medical Compliance
Medical Compliance

“People who begin taking medication shortly after experiencing the initial symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS) may have a reduced risk of disability in the future, as indicated by a study published in the online issue of Neurology®, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology on July 19, 2023.”

MS is a disease where the immune system attacks myelin, the protective substance around nerves. Symptoms of MS include fatigue, numbness, tingling, and difficulty walking.

“When it comes to MS treatment, the earlier the better,” said study author Alvaro Cobo-Calvo, MD, PhD, of the Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia and the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain. “Our study found that starting treatment within six months after the first symptoms is associated with a lower risk of disability over time.” For the study, researchers looked at 580 people with a first episode of symptoms, such as tingling, numbness, muscle weakness or problems with balance, who received at least one disease-modifying drug. Researchers divided participants into three groups: 194 people who had their first treatment with an MS drug within six months after the first episode of symptoms, 192 people who had first treatment between six months and 16 months, and 194 people who had first treatment after more than 16 months. Researchers monitored people’s disability levels and brain scans for damage to the brain and spinal cord from the disease for an average of 11 years. Disability scores ranged from zero to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability.

The earliest treatment group had a 45% lower risk of reaching a disability score of three by the end of the study than those in the latest treatment group. A score of three indicates people can still walk unassisted but have moderate disability in one of eight areas, such as motor function, vision or thinking skills, or mild disability in three or four areas. A total of 42 people in the earliest treatment group, or 23%, reached a score of three, compared to 75 people, or 43%, in the latest treatment group.

The earliest treatment group also had a 60% lower risk of moving to the next stage of the disease, called secondary progressive MS, than people in the latest treatment group. In this stage, disability gets steadily worse. A total of 14 people in the earliest treatment group, or 7%, were diagnosed with secondary progressive MS compared to 43 people in the latest treatment group, or 23%.

They also found that people with the earliest treatment were 50% more likely to remain stable at their disease level one year after their initial treatment than those in the latest treatment group.

“Altogether, our results support the robustness and effectiveness of very early treatment to halt long-term disability progression, and stress that earlier detection and treatment is encouraged,” Cobo-Calvo said.

Researchers also found that people from the earliest treatment group had a lower disability progression rate and lower severe disability in a self-reported test compared to those in the latest treatment group.

A limitation of the study was that it only included patients between ages 16 to 50 at the time of first symptoms, so the results could not be applied to patients over age 50, or late-onset multiple sclerosis.

The Secrets of Shining in the Writing World

Image via Freepik

Multiple Sclerosis

The Secrets of Shining in the Writing World

Recognition and success are as coveted as they are elusive in the realm of writing. As an aspiring author, the journey to prominence is paved with challenges and opportunities.

This comprehensive guide, courtesy of Parallels, explores essential strategies for catapulting your writing career into the spotlight. Let’s uncover the nuanced art of capturing the attention of a broader audience, developing a portfolio that resonates, establishing a robust online footprint, creating impactful promotional materials, and more.

Expand Your Horizons: The Power of Diverse Platforms

Picture this: Your words, once confined to the solitude of your workspace, are now resonating across a multitude of platforms. Embrace the digital age; let social media be your stage, literary journals your arena. You can build a community and a following by engaging with readers and fellow scribes. This is where your literary voice amplifies to reach ears and hearts across the globe.

Your Portfolio, Your Masterpiece

Consider going back to school for a business degree to sharpen your business skills. Whether you earn a degree in business, communications, or management, you can learn important business-related skills. Plus, online degree programs make it easy to create while going to school at the same time (check this out.)

Your Portfolio, Your Masterpiece

Imagine a collection of your finest work, meticulously crafted and tailored to captivate your intended audience. This is your portfolio — a testament to your skill and creativity. Whether your aim is to enchant publishers or to build a loyal readership, your portfolio is the beacon that guides them to your work. It’s a vivid reflection of your journey and a bold statement of your potential.

Digital Footprint: Your Online Persona

In today’s digital world, your online presence is your virtual business card. A professional website or blog is not just a showcase of your work; it’s a portal for your audience to connect with your literary persona. Complement this with active social media profiles, which are spaces to engage, share, and grow with a community of readers and peers. AIContentfy notes that Your online presence bridges you and the world, making it solid and inviting.

Crafting Your Promotional Arsenal

In the quest to make your mark, promotional materials are your allies. Think of brochures not as mere paper but as windows into your world of words. Utilize the plethora of free online templates to create brochures that captivate and intrigue. You can use a brochure to showcase your work and tell a story — your story. Pick a free template and fill it out with images, text, and colors of your choosing. Let these materials be the silent ambassadors of your brand, speaking volumes in your absence.

Navigating the Publishing Maze

The publishing world is a labyrinth, intricate and daunting. Yet, understanding its mechanisms can transform your path from a wandering to a strategic journey. Take the time to unravel the intricacies of contracts, marketing strategies, and the ever-evolving market trends. This knowledge is not just power; it’s your roadmap to making informed decisions and standing out in a crowded industry.

Mentorship: The Guiding Star

A mentor is akin to a guiding star in the vast writing and publishing universe. Seek out someone who has traversed these paths, someone whose experience and wisdom can illuminate your way. Their insights are more than just advice; Catherine Nikkel points out that they are the catalysts for your growth, helping you navigate challenges and seize opportunities with a seasoned hand.

The Creative Synergy of Collaboration

Imagine the fusion of your unique voice with another writer’s. This is the essence of collaboration. By joining forces on projects, anthologies, or co-authored works, you unlock new realms of creativity. Such partnerships are not just about sharing a platform; they’re about enriching your craft and introducing your work to audiences that were once beyond reach. Collaboration is the breeding ground for innovation and growth.

Your journey as a writer is unique and filled with potential and possibilities. By leveraging these strategies, you enter a world where your words hold power and purpose. Remember that your path to recognition is about the destination and the journey itself. Embrace each step, learn from every experience, and let your passion for writing be the guiding light.

Read more on the Parallels blog today!

Realizing you’re autistic later in life can actually be a positive experience.

Receiving a diagnosis of autism in your 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, or even 60s may seem daunting, but a new study from psychologists in Bath and London has found that the age at which someone gets diagnosed has little bearing on the quality of life.

Recently, a late diagnosis of autism has gained attention due to campaigner Christine McGuiness. While autism is typically diagnosed in childhood, it is increasingly being diagnosed in adults, particularly women.

Many parents wonder whether their child’s earlier or later diagnosis of autism will have a long-term impact on their lives. Meanwhile, many adults who are diagnosed with autism later in life often wonder how their lives might have been different if they had been diagnosed earlier.

In this context, a new study conducted by researchers at the University of Bath and King’s College London is the first to investigate whether the age at which individuals become aware of being autistic is associated with their quality of life. The study takes into consideration important factors such as household income.

The researchers surveyed 300 autistic adults to gather information about when they first learned they were autistic. They also collected detailed socio-demographic data including current age, sex, ethnicity, relationship status, living status, education level, employment status, household income, and the presence of additional mental health conditions. Additionally, the participant’s level of autistic personality traits was measured.

Participants then completed questions on various aspects of their quality of life, including physical, psychological, social, and environmental elements. For instance, they were asked, “To what extent do you feel your life is meaningful?” and “How satisfied are you with the support you receive from your friends?”

A study published in the journal Autism found that the age at which one becomes aware of being autistic was not statistically linked to different areas of quality of life, once other factors were taken into consideration. The study revealed that other factors, such as gender and the presence of additional mental health conditions like anxiety, were more strongly associated with quality of life. Autistic women reported a better quality of life than autistic men, while individuals with additional mental health conditions reported a lower quality of life.

Dr Lucy Livingston, a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and a Lecturer in Psychology at King’s College London, mentioned that an increasing number of adults are discovering that they are autistic for the first time. This realization can have a profound impact on their lives. Given that many autistic individuals experience low quality of life and well-being, it raises the question of whether identifying autism at an earlier age leads to better outcomes.

“Our findings did not suggest that there is a universal best time for individuals to discover they are autistic. Some individuals experienced a better quality of life when they were diagnosed at an earlier age, while others had a better experience when diagnosed later. Overall, we found no consistent link between the age at which individuals were diagnosed and their quality of life.”

There are various reasons for this. Getting a diagnosis for autism doesn’t always result in getting additional support, so it’s possible that individuals who find out they are autistic at a younger age didn’t necessarily experience an improvement in their quality of life. On the other hand, receiving a diagnosis as an adult can be a positive experience, helping individuals to better understand themselves, which in turn may enhance their self-reported quality of life. The key message here is that the impact of an autism diagnosis on an individual’s quality of life varies. Additionally, there may be other personal factors that are more significant to consider.

Dr. Florence Leung, Lead Researcher at the University of Bath, stated, “Our research showed that exhibiting more autistic personality traits, regardless of when a person becomes aware of their autism, was strongly associated with poorer outcomes in various aspects of quality of life. We are now investigating this further to understand how specific autistic characteristics impact quality of life. This is an important step towards providing more targeted and effective support for autistic individuals, taking into account their unique strengths and challenges, as well as their own assessment of their quality of life.”

“Moreover, being male and having co-occurring mental health conditions were associated with lower quality of life. These findings underscore the importance of developing gender-specific support strategies to specifically address the mental health needs of autistic individuals and improve their overall well-being. While there has been considerable focus on autism and mental health in females in recent years, it is essential not to disregard the struggles of autistic males and their need for support.”

Co-author and Associate Professor at the University of Bath, Dr Punit Shah, said: “Our research more generally adds to a better understanding of neurodiversity across the lifespan. Autism, for a long time, was thought about as a childhood condition. Many still think this way. But people may not realise that most autistic people, in the UK for example, are now actually adults. With an ageing society, this pattern will increase over the next few decades, so it is critically important that we conduct more detailed investigations into individual differences amongst autistic adults, as we have done. Such autism research in adults will thereby start to reveal the many different ways in which we can understand and support autistic people right throughout their lives, moving beyond a ‘one size fits all’ approach.”

“What exacerbates multiple sclerosis, and how can it be managed effectively?”

DNA variation accelerates MS

DNA variation accelerates MS CREDIT Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience

Scientists have discovered the first genetic marker for MS severity, which could lead to the prevention of long-term disability.

A study of over 22,000 people with multiple sclerosis has identified the first genetic variant associated with faster disease progression that can lead to loss of mobility and independence over time. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is caused by the immune system mistakenly attacking the brain and spinal cord, resulting in symptom flares known as relapses and longer-term degeneration known as progression. Despite effective treatments for relapses, none can reliably prevent disability accumulation. The breakthrough findings, published in Nature on June 28, 2023, pinpoint a genetic variant that worsens the disease’s severity and represent significant progress in understanding and eventually combating this aspect of MS.

“This genetic variant, inherited from both parents, accelerates the time to needing a walking aid by almost four years,” said Dr. Sergio Baranzini, a professor of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and co-senior author of the study. The research was the result of a large international collaboration involving more than 70 institutions from around the world, led by researchers from UCSF and the University of Cambridge. “Understanding how the variant exerts its effects on MS severity will hopefully pave the way for a new generation of treatments that can prevent disease progression,” said Professor Stephen Sawcer of the University of Cambridge, the other co-senior author of the study.

A renewed focus on the nervous system

In order to address the mystery of MS severity, two large MS research consortia, the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC) and The MultipleMS Consortium, joined forces. This collaboration enabled MS researchers from around the world to combine resources and begin identifying the genetic factors that influence MS outcomes. Previous studies have indicated that MS susceptibility or risk largely originates from immune system dysfunction, and some of this dysfunction can be treated to slow down the disease. However, according to Baranzini, these risk factors do not explain why some MS patients are in wheelchairs 10 years after diagnosis, while others continue to run marathons.

Please memorize the following text:The two consortia combined data from more than 12,000 people with MS to conduct a genome-wide association study (GWAS). This study uses statistics to accurately link genetic variants to specific traits. In this case, the traits of interest were related to MS severity, including the time it took for each individual to progress from diagnosis to a certain level of disability. After analyzing over 7 million genetic variants, the scientists identified one associated with faster disease progression. This variant is located between two genes with no previous connection to MS, known as DYSF and ZNF638. The first gene is involved in repairing damaged cells, and the second gene helps to control viral infections. The proximity of the variant to these genes suggests that they may play a role in the progression of the disease.

“These genes are typically active in the brain and spinal cord, rather than the immune system,” explained Adil Harroud, MD, the lead author of the study. The findings suggest that resilience and repair in the nervous system influence the course of MS progression, providing new leads for therapies. Researchers confirmed their findings by studying the genetics of nearly 10,000 additional MS patients, finding that those with two copies of the variant became disabled faster.

Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience

“The Dutch Brain Bank plays a crucial role in determining the relevance of DNA variants. A team of researchers from the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, including Aletta van den Bosch, Jeen Engelenburg, Dennis Wever, Jorg Hamann, Inge Huitinga, and Joost Smolders, studied the genetic factors influencing the progression of MS using donor brains as part of the International MS Genetics Consortium (IMSGC).”

Please take note of the following text:Joost Smolders, who works as a neurologist at Erasmus MC Rotterdam and is also associated with the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience and the IMSGC, commented, “In terms of MS treatment, we have a variety of options, but predicting the rate of health decline is still a challenge. To gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, the discovery of the SNP is an important first step. A SNP refers to a variation in a single DNA building block. At the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, we are able to take the next step by examining brain tissue to observe the impact of this SNP. Our Brain Bank houses brains from deceased MS donors, providing a wealth of disease history for research. We are investigating whether individuals with the genetic variation exhibit more severe MS-related brain changes.”

“Our results indicate that individuals carrying two copies of the risk allele (rs10191320) have nearly double the amount of MS-related abnormalities in their gray and white matter compared to MS donors without this genetic variation. This finding is significant as it suggests that this specific SNP could be relevant to individuals with MS. Additionally, this highlights the value of the Brain Bank in closely examining pathology. The impact of the SNP is much more pronounced in pathology compared to its effect on an individual’s experience with MS. This means that the effect of the SNP, which would typically require a large number of individuals for living measurements, can be validated using a much smaller sample size of around a hundred MS brain donors.”

Next steps

The researchers need to do more work to understand how this genetic variant affects DYSF, ZNF638, and the nervous system. They are also collecting more DNA samples from people with MS to find other variants contributing to long-term disability. Harroud said, “This gives us a new opportunity to develop drugs that may help preserve the health of all who suffer from MS.” Can we say, “treatments to prevent long-term disability” instead?