Novel immune cell population may trigger inflammation in multiple sclerosis and other brain disorders

Inflammatory lesion

Inflammatory lesion in the spinal cord of a mouse model of multiple sclerosis demonstrating the presence of ILC3 (green) or T cells (red). CREDIT Image courtesy of Dr. Christopher N. Parkhurst.

A group of immune cells that normally protect against inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract may have the opposite effect in multiple sclerosis (MS) and other brain inflammation-related conditions, according to a new study by Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian researchers. The results suggest that countering the activity of these cells could be a new therapeutic approach for such conditions.

The researchers, who reported their finding Dec. 1 in Nature, were studying a set of immune cells called group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s), which help the immune system tolerate beneficial microbes and suppress inflammation in the intestines and other organs throughout the body. They discovered a unique subset of these ILC3s that circulate in the bloodstream and can infiltrate the brain—and, to their surprise, do not quench inflammation but instead ignite it.

The scientists called this subset inflammatory ILC3s, and found them in the central nervous system of mice with a condition modeling MS. Instead of constraining the immune response, this subset of ILC3s spurred another group of immune cells called T cells to attack myelinated nerve fibers, leading to MS-like disease symptoms. The researchers detected similar inflammatory ILC3s in the peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients.

“This work has the potential to inform our understanding of, and potential treatments for, a broad variety of conditions involving T-cell infiltration of the brain,” said senior author Dr. Gregory Sonnenberg, associate professor of microbiology and immunology in medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and a member of the Jill Roberts Institute for Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease at Weill Cornell Medicine.

MS affects more than two million people worldwide. Other conditions that feature chronic brain inflammation afflict tens of millions more and include Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. There is also evidence that neuroinflammation develops naturally with aging and is a major factor in age-related cognitive decline, and more recently inflammatory T-cell responses in the brain have been linked to neurological symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The researchers have shown in recent work that ILC3s residing in the gut act as sentinels and immune regulators, suppressing inflammation—including inflammatory T-cell activity—and warding off cancer. In the new study, they examined the roles of ILC3s in the brain, and found, contrary to their expectation, that ILC3s are not normally present in the brain under healthy conditions but can infiltrate the brain from the bloodstream during inflammation. When they do infiltrate the central nervous system, they have pro-inflammatory rather than anti-inflammatory effects.

The researchers showed with a mouse model of MS that these inflammatory ILC3s in the brain function as antigen-presenting cells: They display bits of myelin protein, the main ingredient in the insulating layer around nerve fibers, to T cells—prompting them to attack myelin, causing the nerve damage that gives rise to disease signs. They found the inflammatory ILC3s in close association with T cells in regions of active inflammation and nerve damage in the mouse brains.

“The infiltration of these inflammatory ILC3s to the brains and spinal cords of mice coincides with the onset and peak of disease,” said first author John Benji Grigg, a Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences doctoral candidate in the Sonnenberg laboratory. “Further, our experimental data in mice demonstrate these immune cells play a key role in driving the pathogenesis of neuro-inflammation.”

The researchers discovered that they could prevent MS-like disease in the animals by removing from the ILC3s a key molecule called MHCII, which normally is used in the antigen-presenting process—the removal essentially blocks the cells’ ability to activate myelin-attacking T cells.

“Despite our very best disease-modifying therapies for MS, patients continue to progress, and since disease onset is early in life, they face the prospect of permanent physical and cognitive disability,” said co-author Dr. Tim Vartanian, professor of neuroscience in the Feil Family Brain and Mind Institute at Weill Cornell Medicine, chief of the division of multiple sclerosis and neuro-immunology and a professor of neurology in the Department of Neurology at Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center. “Identification of inflammatory ILC3s with antigen presentation capabilities in the central nervous system of people with MS offers a new strategic target to prevent nervous system injury.”

Finally, the researchers discovered that ILC3s that reside in other tissues in the body can be programmed, in effect, to counter the activity of brain-infiltrating T cells, preventing the MS-like condition disease in mice.

This work was completed in close collaboration with Dr. Ari Waisman, director of the Institute for Molecular Medicine at the University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, where the researchers built on prior research demonstrating that there are gut-resident ILC3s that display antigens to T cells in a slightly different way to promote T-cell inactivity, or “tolerance.” The researchers demonstrated that by experimentally exposing these tolerance-inducing intestinal ILC3s to myelin, they could block neuroinflammatory T-cell activity and the development of MS-like disease in the mice.

The work therefore points to the possibility that MS and potentially many other inflammatory conditions could someday be treated either by directly inhibiting the activity of inflammatory ILC3s that infiltrate the brain, or by targeting self-antigens to the intestinal ILC3s that promote tolerance in other tissues, Dr. Sonnenberg said.

Subminiature multifunctional brain chip analyzes brain activity from multiple aspects

Neurotransmitter analysis through a subminiature chip 1/8th the size of commercial chips. Simultaneous pharmaceutical injection, cerebrospinal fluid extraction, and brain signal measurement expected to contribute to the development of medicine

Fabricated bimodal MEMS neural probe

Cross-sectional image of the shank showing the embedded glass anchor and microfluidic channels and the electrical signal lines CREDIT Korea Institute of Science and Technology(KIST)

Various neurotransmitters play a key role in the signal transmission process between neurons in the brain. If the concentration of neurotransmitters is higher or lower than normal, it triggers various brain diseases for which neurotransmitters are injected as treatments. Therefore, the accurate measurement of neurotransmitter concentration is crucial for investigating the cause or during the treatment of brain diseases.

Previously, neurotransmitter concentrations were measured by inserting a 0.5 mm cerebrospinal fluid tube in the brain. This method could damage brain tissues, and the tube, which is attached to several brain sections, impedes the analysis of neurotransmitters in specific segments. Moreover, the correlation analysis between neurotransmitters and brain activity has been challenging as the brain signals that are the main indicators of normal brain activity could not be measured.

A research team led by Dr. Il-Joo Cho at the Brain Science Institute of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST, President Seok-jin Yoon) announced that they had developed a subminiature multifunctional brain chip that integrated the fluid channel for extracting cerebrospinal fluid, the fluid channel for injecting medicine, and the electrodes that measure brain signals, to overcome the abovementioned limitations.

The research team had previously published an article in an international journal regarding their development of the world’s first brain chip that can simultaneously inject medicine and measure signals. They also integrated a fluid tube for extracting the cerebrospinal fluid as they considered it critical to analyzing brain activity as well as brain signals. The developed chip is 1/8th the size of the current commercial cerebrospinal fluid extraction device, minimizes the damage of brain tissues during the insertion process, and enables a precise analysis of brain activities by observing neurotransmitters and brain signals. Furthermore, the cerebrospinal fluid is extracted at a low pressure through the small fluid tube to minimize channel blockages occurring from prolonged use.

They inserted the multifunctional brain chip into a living mouse to extract its cerebrospinal fluid and measure brain signals. After injecting a substance that controls the neurological activity into the mouse, the neurotransmitter and brain signal change were examined over time to verify the substance’s treatment effect from multiple aspects. Consequently, the developed brain chip was confirmed as a new tool that can potentially verify the medicine for brain disease treatment.

Dr. Il-Joo Cho claimed, “The new brain chip is small, yet it can perform various functions simultaneously. It will be useful in minimizing brain damage and studying the cause and treatment for brain diseases. We expect that the system we developed will be applied to various brain disease model animals and contribute to developing treatment for brain diseases.”

Gilroy man beats 9-year-old kid with autism – this is so shocking!

Gilroy man beats 9-year-old kid with autism - YouTube


” Gilory Police Department reported a suspect broke into the victims home in Gilroy with another man and battered at 9-year-old with autism while he was sleeping.

The suspects ran away, but the victim’s mother believes Joseph Sanseverino was responsible for the attack. According to the police, Sanseverino was dating the victim’s mother and was living with them.”

Poor quality of sleep and falling asleep later are associated with poorer control of blood sugar after meals


A new study published in Diabetologia (the journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes [EASD]) finds that later bedtime routines and poor quality of sleep are associated with higher blood glucose levels and poorer control of blood sugar following meals.

The research was conducted by Neli Tsereteli, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Malmö, Sweden, and Professor Paul Franks of both Lund University Diabetes Centre, Malmö, Sweden and Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, and colleagues.

The authors examined whether night-to-night fluctuations in sleep duration, efficiency, or timing affect postprandial (after meal) glucose response to breakfast the following day.

Diet, exercise, and sleep are fundamental components of a healthy lifestyle; however, the role that sleep plays in affecting the body’s control of blood sugar in people who are generally healthy has been subject to relatively little study so far. Sleep disorders often occur alongside other health problems, which allows them to act as a measure of general health.

Quality of sleep also has a direct causal effect on many life-threatening conditions such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes (T2D); and disturbed sleep caused by conditions such as obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with both the prevalence of T2D and the risk of complications arising from the disease. This and other evidence suggest a strong link between both the quality and duration of sleep, and the ability of the body to properly regulate glucose levels.

The authors note: “While there have been numerous large prospective cohort studies focused on the relationship between self-reported sleep, disease and wellbeing, objective data on sleep and postprandial glucose metabolism typically comes from small studies conducted in tightly controlled settings and in specific population subgroups such as those suffering sleep disturbances owing to pregnancy, sleep apnoea, depression, obesity or diabetes…Because of this, there is a need for greater evidence of the effects of sleep on glucose metabolism in healthy individuals.”

The researchers looked at the relationship between sleep (duration, efficiency, and the midpoint between going to sleep and waking up) and postprandial glycaemic response (change in blood glucose levels after eating a meal) to breakfasts of varying macronutrient composition in a study group of 953 healthy adults from the UK and USA. Participants were enrolled into the ZOE Personalized REsponses to DIetary Composition Trial 1 (PREDICT1), the largest scientific nutrition studies of their kind in the world, which was conducted over 14 days and involved them consuming standardised test meals with a known content of carbohydrates, fat, protein, and dietary fibre. Blood sugar was monitored using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device which took sample data every 15 minutes for the entire duration of the study, while sleep monitoring was performed by an actigraphy unit: a device worn on the wrist which measures the participant’s movements. 

The study found that while there was no statistically significant association between length of sleep period and postprandial glycaemic response, there was a significant interaction when the nutritional content of the breakfast meal was also considered. Longer sleep periods were associated with lower blood glucose following high-carbohydrate and high-fat breakfasts, indicating better control of blood sugar. Additionally, the researchers observed a within-person effect in which a study participant sleeping for longer than they typically would was likely to have with reduced postprandial blood glucose following a high-carbohydrate or high-fat breakfast the next day.

The authors also found a significant link between sleep efficiency (ratio of time asleep to total length of sleep period), which indicates disturbed sleep, and glycaemic control that was independent of the nutritional makeup of the following day’s breakfast. Participants with higher sleep efficiency were on average more likely to have lower postprandial blood glucose than those with lower sleep efficiency. When a participant slept more efficiently than they did normally, their postprandial blood glucose also tended to be lower than usual.

Timing of sleep had a significant effect with a later sleep midpoint being associated with higher blood glucose. This effect was primarily caused by changes to sleep onset (falling asleep later) rather than differences in sleep offset (waking later) and was observed to negatively impact glycaemic control both when comparisons were made between study participants, and when looking at variations in the sleep patterns of individual participants.

The authors say: “Our data suggest that sleep duration, efficiency and midpoint are important determinants of postprandial glycaemic control at a population level, while illustrating that to optimise sleep recommendations it is likely necessary to tailor these to the individual…These findings underscore the importance of sleep in regulating metabolic health, and a combination of both general and more personalised sleep guidelines is likely to be necessary to enable patients to minimise their risk of metabolic disease.”

They conclude: “This study’s findings may inform lifestyle strategies to improve postprandial blood glucose levels, focusing on earlier bedtime routines and maximising high-quality uninterrupted sleep. A combination of both generalised and more personalised sleep guidelines is likely required to ensure optimal metabolic health per se and maximise the effectiveness of guidelines for diabetes prevention.”