Non-opioid compounds squelch pain without sedation

New molecules are lead candidates for an alternative to narcotics, say UCSF researchers

Pain
Pain

A newly identified set of molecules alleviated pain in mice while avoiding the sedating affect that limits the use of opiates, according to a new study led by researchers at UC San Francisco.
The molecules act on the same receptor as clonidine and dexmedetomidine—drugs commonly used in hospitals as sedatives—but are chemically unrelated to them and may not be addictive.  

Clonidine and dexmedetomidine are also both effective pain killers but so sedating that they are rarely used for pain relief outside of the hospital.   

“We showed that it’s possible to separate the analgesic and sedative effects related to this receptor, said Brian Shoichet, PhD, professor in the School of Pharmacy, and one of four senior authors of the study, which appears in the Sept. 30, 2022, issue of Science. “That makes it a very promising target for drug development.”

The research is part of a five-year grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and began shortly before the COVID-19 pandemic, with the aim of finding effective painkillers that can be used together or in conjunction with opioids. 

The work brings together researchers from a variety of disciplines; Shoichet’s co-authors include UCSF anatomy chair Allan Basbaum, PhD, chemist Peter Gmeiner of Freidrichs Alexander University in Germany, structural biologist Yang Du, PhD, of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and molecular biologist Michel Bouvier, PhD, of the University of Montreal.

“Together, we were able to take this from the most fundamental level to identifying new molecules that might be relevant, and then to demonstrating that, in fact, they are relevant,” said Basbaum. “That doesn’t happen very often.” 

6 Molecules Out of 300 Million

Shoichet was encouraged to look for substances that would activate this adrenergic receptor, called alpha2a, by Basbaum, who had studied it in his lab and showed that it is tied to pain relief. 

To start the search for molecules that would bind firmly to the receptor, Shoichet computationally combed through a virtual library of over 300 million molecules, eliminating those that were too bulky for the small receptor. The remaining thousands were virtually “docked,” one by one, on a computer model of the receptor.

Through a series of tests, Shoichet narrowed the field from an initial 48 candidates to six, based on how they bound to the receptor in cultured human and mouse cells. Each of the final six was tested on three different mouse models for acute and chronic pain, and successfully alleviated pain in all three instances. 

The pain-relieving molecules, which were from chemically different families, are also entirely novel. None of them had previously been synthesized. 

Whereas the older drugs, like dexmedetomidine, activate a broad spectrum of neuronal pathways, the new molecules trigger only a selective subset of these, Shoichet said. The molecules also concentrate in the brain, and bind tightly to the receptor, making them good candidates for further development. 

Hope for 1 in 5 Americans

Basbaum cautions that it may take several years of research before any of the compounds could be tested in clinical trials. The researchers don’t yet understand possible side effects of the new molecules, and whether there might be unintended consequences from long-term use. 

He believes, however, that it’s unlikely the compound is addictive. “Substance abuse happens when the drug generates a reward, which we didn’t see any evidence of,” he said. 

While opioids clearly help patients with pain from surgery or cancer, Basbaum noted that the majority of the 50 million Americans with chronic pain have other conditions, like back injuries, joint pain, and inflammatory disease, that often aren’t helped by the drugs. New analgesics could completely change the outlook for these patients.

“If we can create a drug that works in combination with a much lower dose of opiate, that would be the dream,” he said. “The need for that is huge.”

Study advances knowledge of the role of brain pathology and cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis

Kessler researchers demonstrate the relationship between the rate of cognitive fatigue in MS and microstructural brain changes. Findings promise to advance the development of clinical interventions for disabling fatigue

Rocco Ortenzio Neuroimaging Center at Kessler Foundation

This study was conducted using the latest neuroimaging techniques at the Ortenzio Center, which is dedicated solely to rehabilitation research, CREDIT Kessler Foundation

Using advanced diffusion neuroimaging technology, Kessler Foundation researchers investigated the relationship between the rate of cognitive fatigue to microstructural changes in the brain in persons with multiple sclerosis. Their findings help fill a gap in the current understanding of how brain pathology influences the development of fatigue over time.

Their findings were reported in Frontiers in Neurology on July 04, 2022, in the open access article “Associations of White Matter and Basal Ganglia Microstructure to Cognitive Fatigue Rate in Multiple Sclerosis,” (doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.911012). The authors are Cristina Almeida Flores Román, PhDGlenn Wylie, DPhilJohn DeLuca, PhD, and Bing Yao, PhD, and of Kessler Foundation.

The study was conducted at the Rocco Ortenzio Neuroimaging Center at Kessler Foundation, which is dedicated solely to rehabilitation research. Participants were 62 individuals with relapsing-remitting MS. All completed questionnaires measuring depression, state and trait anxiety, and trait fatigue. While in the scanner, participants underwent a cognitively fatiguing task. In addition to measuring rate of cognitive fatigue, researchers measured whole brain lesion volume and performance during the fatigue-inducing task.

“We found that the cognitive rate related to white matter tracts, many with associations with the basal ganglia or what we have proposed as the ‘fatigue network’,” said lead author Dr. Román, National MS Society postdoctoral fellow at Kessler Foundation. “These findings bring us closer to understanding how brain pathology impacts the experience in the moment. This is fundamental to developing effective interventions for managing the disabling fatigue of MS and other neurological conditions.”

Researchers develop non-invasive blood glucose monitoring process

Researchers develop non-invasive blood glucose monitoring process


A new non-invasive blood glucose monitoring process is in development. CREDIT Kennesaw State University

As a child, Maria Valero witnessed her diabetic father prick his finger several times a day to draw blood and check his glucose levels using an electronic monitor. She was concerned about the invasive and painful process but was also curious about the technology behind the device.

“After watching my father go through that, I wanted to create something less invasive,” said Valero.

The assistant professor of information technology in Kennesaw State’s College of Computing and Software Engineering (CCSE) and director of KSU’s IoT as a Service Research Group is working to improve the glucose monitoring process for the millions of people around the world affected by diabetes.

Researchers develop non-invasive blood glucose monitoring process

Researcher Maria Valero has developed a non-invasive blood glucose monitoring process to help people with diabetes. CREDIT Kennesaw State University

Using funding from the College and a lot of trial and error, Valero and her team created a non-invasive process that can identify the exact value of blood glucose with 90% accuracy without taking a blood sample. The GlucoCheck process uses light shone through human tissue, in either the ear or finger, and a small camera to capture images on the other side. Valero’s team then uses a model to study the amount of light absorption in those images to determine blood glucose concentration. 

“Our pilot study was very successful,” she said. “We are excited about how this device will help people with diabetes, which affects about one in every 10 people in the United States.”

Valero and her team recently filed a provisional patent application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to protect the process they created. Director of Kennesaw State’s Office of Intellectual Property Development Chris Cornelison helped Valero sift through research projects around the world to make sure the GlucoCheck process is unique and patentable. 

“The way we gather and output the data is novel, and we will continue to work on ways to improve the glucose estimation model,” Valero said. The team has tested the process on nearly 50 people so far, but before filing a full patent next summer, they will assess how the process works on people with a range of skin pigmentations and skin thickness.

Valero’s students have already created a mobile phone application and are working on connecting GlucoCheck to Amazon’s virtual assistant, Alexa.

“I am very fortunate to have great students who are extremely motivated and bring a wealth of knowledge to this project,” Valero said. “Watching them grow as researchers who want to make a difference in the world using technology is very rewarding.”

According to Paola Spoletini, interim associate dean of CCSE, Valero’s commitment to her research is compounded by her dedication to her students. 

“Dr. Valero is passionate about using technology to make a difference in the world, and she is an incredible asset to our College,” Spoletini said. “Not only is she developing cutting-edge technologies, but she also serves as a mentor and role model to her students.”

In addition to her students, Valero has worked closely with Hossain Shahriar, associate professor of information technology, and Katherine Ingram, associate professor of exercise science. Ingram is currently researching gestational diabetes risk, and Shahriar’s research focuses on health information technology, data analytics and cybersecurity. Their paper detailing the pilot study was recently accepted into the Journal of Medical Internet Research, and Valero has used the data to apply for additional funding.

How to Become Your Own Best Health Advocate

Wonder Woman (Lynda Carter) Stunning in her Season 2 Costume 1080P BD -  YouTube


As the medical system struggles to grow and evolve, it’s easy for patients to fall through the cracks. That makes it harder and harder to speak up and advocate for your own health. However, you know your body best! Becoming your own health advocate will ensure you get the referrals, treatments, tests, and diagnoses you need to maintain your quality of life. Here’s how to become an informed and persistent advocate for yourself in the healthcare system, courtesy of Patient Talk.

Research Your Senior Living Options

If you’re a senior and you anticipate needing help with daily tasks at some point in your future, start looking into your senior living options now. Remember, this is your decision! By being informed and knowing what you want, you can advocate for the senior living solution that best fits your needs.

For example, skilled nursing facilities provide a high level of care that is ideal for those with serious health issues that require round-the-clock support. Even if you don’t require this level of care right now, reviewing local facilities and picking out your favorite options will help you make a confident and informed decision when the time comes.

Learn About Your Insurance Coverage

Many people don’t understand how their health insurance works. According to CNBC, just 4% of Americans are able to correctly define common insurance terms that determine how much they would pay out-of-pocket for prescriptions and medical services. What’s more, only half the population is confident in their ability to choose the right health insurance policy for their needs. Knowing how your health insurance works will help you make better healthcare decisions and get the most out of your policy.

Keep Your Medical Records Organized

Maintaining copies of your own health records will ensure you always have access to important health information when you need it. As a result, you’ll never have to go through the hassle of transferring your health records or trying to access results from a blood test. You’ll have all the same information your doctors have, so you can do your own research and bring your own suggestions to doctor’s visits. Take advantage of free online tools to keep all of your medical records in one place. Wondering how to combine PDF files? It’s a simple process, and having those PDFs combined and readily accessible will save you lots of confusion.

Do Your Own Research

While it’s important to listen to your doctor and heed their advice, doing your own research never hurts. You might just come up with a suggestion or solution that your doctor overlooks. Thuasne USA explains that doctors rely on their patients to offer clear and concise descriptions of their conditions so they can make an accurate assessment, and researching your situation on your own can help you better articulate your experience.

Take Responsibility for Your Wellbeing

The more you can limit your reliance on the healthcare system, the better. By incorporating preventive care into your wellness plan, you can spend less time at the doctor and more time living your life! Research shows that simple healthy lifestyle habits like eating a balanced diet, exercising regularly, and getting enough sleep can help ward off a number of common lifestyle diseases like diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Even if you work a lot, you should be able to fit healthy habits into your routine. For example, try taking the stairs at work and going for a walk on your lunch break to squeeze a little extra movement into your day.

Don’t wait for someone else to advocate for your health. Become your own health advocate by understanding your insurance, researching your senior living options, maintaining your health records, and taking wellness into your own hands. It’s time to stand up for your health!

Patient Talk is here to help you take charge of your health! If you have any questions, please email info@patienttalk.org.

Researchers share guidelines for inclusive language in autism research – what do you think?

In the decades since the “clinical” definitions of autism in the 1980s, many have been advocating for understanding autism as a normal part of the neurodiversity spectrum rather than as a “problem” to be “fixed.” Still, in the research literature, autism is often described using medical or pathologizing language. To make autism research less harmful to the autistic community, researchers publishing in the journal Trends in Neurosciences on September 29 lay out a data-driven guide for how scientists and researchers should talk about autism in their work.

“The evolution in the understanding of autism has also mirrored a transition in the use of language in research contexts,” write the authors. “Historically, most autism research has been carried out without input from autistic people. This research has often described autism and autistic people using medicalized, pathologizing, and deficit-based language (e.g., disorder, impairment, cure) and person-first language (e.g., child with autism).”

The paper was authored by Ruth Monk, an autistic researcher at University of Auckland in New Zealand; Andrew Whitehouse, an autism researcher at the Telethon Kids Institute and professor at The University of Western Australia; and Hannah Waddington, a senior lecturer in educational psychology at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

The authors offer a table of potentially offensive language and preferred alternatives, compiled from several large surveys of autistic community members.

For example, “Autism Spectrum Disorder” should be replaced with “autism”; “person with autism” replaced with “autistic person”; “normal” replaced with “allistic” or “non-autistic”; and “co-morbidity” with “co-occurring.”

“Autistic people have the most intimate autism expertise through their first-hand lived experience,” the authors write. “Thus, there is increasingly widespread acknowledgement that the terminology used to refer to autism and autistic people should prioritize the perspectives and preferences of autistic people themselves. These preferences been explored by several large surveys conducted by researchers and autistic advocates.”

The authors also advocate for a shift in the way autism research is conducted. “Specifically,” they write, “the increasing use of participatory and co-produced research aims to reduce power imbalance between the researcher and the autistic community and to ensure that autistic people are involved throughout the research process.”