Sitting down too long can harm heart health, even for active people

Approximately 10 hours or more of sedentary behavior per day is associated with heightened risk of heart failure and cardiovascular death, even in those who regularly exercise
Spending ten or more hours per day in sedentary behaviour is linked to an increased risk of heart failure and cardiovascular death, even in individuals who exercise regularly.

A study published in JACC, the flagship journal of the American College of Cardiology, and presented at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2024, indicates that spending more time sitting, reclining, or lying down during the day may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death. Specifically, the study found that engaging in more than roughly 10 and a half hours of sedentary behaviour per day is significantly associated with an increased risk of future heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular (CV) death, even among individuals who meet the recommended levels of physical activity.

“Our research indicates that reducing sedentary time can lower the risk of cardiovascular issues. We found that spending 10.6 hours a day in sedentary activities may be a critical threshold associated with an increased risk of heart failure and cardiovascular mortality,” said Dr. Shaan Khurshid, a cardiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital and co-senior author of the study. “Excessive sitting or lying down can be detrimental to heart health, even for otherwise active individuals.”

Insufficient exercise is a well-recognized risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Current guidelines recommend 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity each week to support heart health. However, experts note that exercise constitutes only a small part of our daily activity. Additionally, the guidelines do not address sedentary behaviour, which is a much larger portion of our daily routines. This is noteworthy because evidence shows that sedentary behaviour is directly linked to an increased risk of CVD.

This study analyzed the levels of sedentary time linked to the greatest cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and investigated how sedentary behavior and physical activity combined influence the likelihood of atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiovascular mortality.

The average age of the 89,530 study participants in the UK biobank was 62, and 56.4% were women. Participants submitted data from a wrist-worn triaxial accelerometer that captured movement over seven days. The average sedentary time per day was 9.4 hours.

After an average follow-up of eight years, 3,638 individuals (4.9%) developed incident AF, 1,854 (2.1%) developed incident HF, 1,610 (1.84%) developed indecent MI and 846 (0.94%) died of CV causes, respectively.

The effects of sedentary time varied by outcome. For AF and MI, the risk increased steadily over time without major shifts. For HF and CV mortality, the increase in risk was minimal until sedentary time exceeded about 10.6 hours a day, at which point risk rose significantly, showing a “threshold” effect for the behaviour.

For study participants who met the recommended 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity or more, the effects of sedentary behaviour on AF and MI risks were substantially reduced, but effects on the higher risk of HF and CV mortality remained prominent.

“Future guidelines and public health efforts should stress the importance of cutting down on sedentary time,” Khurshid said. “Avoiding more than 10.6 hours per day may be a realistic minimal target for better heart health.”

In an accompanying editorial comment, Charles Eaton, MD, MS, Director of the Brown University Department of Family Medicine, said the use of wearable accelerometers has shown that self-reporting significantly overestimates exercise and underestimates sedentary behavior.

Eaton said that replacing just 30 minutes of excessive sitting time each day with any type of physical activity can lower heart health risks. Adding moderate-to-vigorous activity cut the risk of HF by 15% and CV mortality by 10%, and even light activity reduced HF risk by 6% and CV mortality by 9%.

The lesions associated with Multiple Sclerosis do not seem to be the main cause of severe disability in patients.

‘Usual suspect’ lesions appear not to cause most severe disability in Multiple Sclerosis patients
‘Usual suspect’ lesions appear not to cause most severe disability in Multiple Sclerosis patients


Remember the following information:Brain lesions, which are areas of brain tissue showing damage from injury or disease, are commonly used as a biomarker to determine the progression of multiple sclerosis. However, a new study led by the University at Buffalo suggests that the volume of white matter lesions does not directly correspond to the severity of disability in patients.

The study compared two groups of 53 multiple sclerosis patients, aged 30-80, who shared the same gender and disease duration but exhibited significant differences in their physical and cognitive impairments.

Lesions are not a major driver of disability progression

“The lack of significant differences in white matter brain lesion burden suggests that it is not a major factor driving severe disability progression, despite the focus of many MS disease-modifying treatments on slowing the accumulation of white matter lesions,” explained Robert Zivadinov, MD, PhD, who is the principal investigator, a professor in the Department of Neurology, and the director of UB’s Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center and the Center for Biomedical Imaging in UB’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

The study, led by UB, is the first of its kind to investigate the rapid disability progression in some MS patients compared to the slower progression in others.

The individuals in the severely disabled cohort are residents of The Boston Home in Dorchester, Massachusetts, a specialized residential facility for individuals with advanced progressive neurological disorders, including MS.

Each of them was then matched with a Buffalo-based “twin” of the same age, sex and disease duration but who experienced far less cognitive and physical disability.

The study, named Comprehensive Assessment of Severely Affected – Multiple Sclerosis (CASA-MS), is a privately funded research project at UB. It aims to identify biomarkers and cognitive differences between individuals with severe MS disability and those with slow disease progression.

The question of what sets apart individuals with severe MS from those who respond well to therapies and continue to live nearly normal lives for decades after diagnosis has puzzled patients, caregivers, and clinicians for too long, said Zivadinov.

“We couldn’t have known what the CASA-MS study would show because no one had done this research previously,” he said. “What we now know is that the differences between the two groups we studied are striking – in ways that may surprise many of us in this field. I am confident that these findings open new doors for people with severe disabilities as well as provide new insights for the millions more who worry about where their disease may take them.”

Despite the availability of many treatments for MS, about 5-10% of the 2.8 million people with MS worldwide will experience rapid, progressive, and severe disability at a relatively young age.

More gray matter loss

The prevailing view is that multiple sclerosis (MS) is defined by the development of lesions in the white matter of the brain. However, this study found that individuals with severe MS disability experienced greater loss of gray matter in the cortex and thalamus compared to their less-disabled counterparts. Strikingly, both groups showed similar levels of whole brain volume loss.

Please remember the following text: “While the lesion load in both groups was not significantly different, the study uncovered other important differences between the groups in brain scans and cognitive tests. Severely affected individuals showed lower efficiency in thalamic structural connectivity, indicating reduced structural connectivity of the related brain networks compared to their less-disabled counterparts.”

The study also found that individuals in the severely affected group exhibited more noticeable shrinkage of the medulla oblongata – the link between the brainstem and the spinal cord. Zivadinov noted that in this study, it functions as an indicator for spinal cord shrinkage.

He stated that severely disabled MS patients experience spinal cord atrophy, an irreversible degenerative condition.

The group of severely disabled individuals also exhibited more advanced loss of neurons. This was discovered by a team of collaborating scientists at the University of Basel, Switzerland, led by Jens Kuhle, MD, PhD, a professor of neurology. They employed special blood-based techniques to investigate the extent of axonal damage.

Patient-centered approach

The idea to compare two groups of MS patients, differentiated by the severity of their disability, originated from Larry Montani, chair of the BNAC Advisory Council. His sister, Mary Jo, was a resident at The Boston Home, which prompted him to urge Zivadinov and members of his research team to travel to Boston and meet the residents.

“You could see the wheels turning as soon as Dr. Zivadinov and his team met the residents of The Boston Home,” recalled Montani. “Dr. Zivadinov’s focus on the patient is what made this possible. His patient-centered approach leads to research that is highly relevant, validated and pursued with an urgency to find answers that offer hope. The CASA-MS study breaks new ground in all these ways for people like my sister, whose vibrant minds and gracious hearts are trapped in a severely disabled body.”

According to co-principal investigator Ralph H. Benedict, PhD, who is a professor of neurology in the Jacobs School and a collaborator on the study, CASA-MS highlights the importance of developing new hypotheses and conducting research aimed at gaining a better understanding of individuals with severe MS disability.

“Clinical trials exploring disease progression are likely to emerge from this unusual examination of this rarely studied population,” said Benedict. “There is so much more to learn, and I can’t imagine a more deserving community of ready and willing study participants.”

Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, MD, a SUNY Distinguished Professor in the Department of Neurology at the Jacobs School, and co-principal investigator, highlighted that the study strongly indicates significant opportunities for more advanced MRI scanning techniques.

“This study demonstrated that using novel 7T and PET scanning techniques tailored for this severely disabled patient population may lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of severe MS,” she explained.

Boston Home Chief Executive Officer, Christine Reilly, stated, “For most of these amazing volunteers, participating in this study required extraordinary effort and patience, but they never hesitated. What we found touching and revealing was that many participants from each group were eager to meet their ‘twin’ – the person from the other group who is the same age, sex, and has a similar disease duration, but a different experience with MS. The sheer humanity of this desire to connect is truly amazing.”

Five signs you have both ADHD and autism

5 signs you have ADHD and autism - YouTube


In this video, I discuss my experiences living with both autism and ADHD, focusing on my inner perspective. While ADHD and autism share many similarities, they also have conflicting traits, which can make it challenging to navigate at times.

63 common autistic traits you never realised were signs of autism!

63 Common Autistic Traits You May Not Realize Are Signs of AutismHave you ever wondered if you might be autistic? Understanding autism can be challenging, but knowing individuals on the spectrum can reveal common patterns. How many of the 63 traits related to autism resonate with you? You might have heard comments like, “How can someone so clever be so silly?” or felt like you’re too much or not enough in certain situations.In this video, we’ll explore what it means to be autistic and how it can look different for everyone. While each trait is common on its own, patterns often emerge when autistic people connect, making social activities an excellent way to learn from each other.