A nagging sore throat may be an early sign of cancer

A nagging sore throat may be an early sign of cancer

A nagging sore throat may be an early sign of cancer

“Sore throat that won’t go away ‘could be a sign of cancer’ doctors warned,” reports The Independent.

Cancer of the larynx, or voice box, affects about 1,700 people a year in the UK. Most cases develop in people aged 60 and above and it is more common in men. It can be treated, and early detection and treatment can make a real difference. Laryngeal cancer is strongly linked to tobacco smoking, secondhand smoke and heavy drinking.

The main symptom of laryngeal cancer is hoarseness. But researchers have now looked at the records of 806 patients with laryngeal cancer and 3,559 without it to see if there are other warning signs GPs should be aware off.

Their analysis suggests that certain combinations of symptoms may require further testing. A potentially serious pattern of symptoms was found to be when hoarseness was combined with a persistent sore throat. Other potential “red flags” included combinations of sore throat with earache, difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing and insomnia.

Hoarseness, however, remained the most common individual symptom.

The research could be used to update or expand clinical guidelines about when GPs should refer people with suspected cancer for further tests.

If you do have a sore throat, there is no need to panic as it is highly unlikely to be due to cancer and your pharmacist should be able to recommend suitable treatments. But if symptoms do not pass within 1 week then contact your GP for advice.

Where did the story come from?

The researchers who carried out the study were from the University of Exeter. The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research and published in the peer-reviewed British Journal of General Practice and is free to read online.#

The UK media’s coverage of the study was generally accurate. However, when reporting the risks of particular symptoms, the media reports did not make clear that these figures applied only to people aged over 60. So, the use of a photograph of a young woman with a sore throat by the Mail Online is arguably inappropriate and may cause unnecessary alarm.

What kind of research was this?

This was a case control study. Case control studies are used to investigate risk factors associated with a rare outcome, such as laryngeal cancer. In this case, researchers wanted to see what symptoms people reported to GPs in the year before being diagnosed with laryngeal cancer, and whether these reports were more common in people with cancer than without.

What did the research involve?

Researchers used anonymised patient information from the UK’s Clinical Practice Research Datalink network of more than 600 general practices. They found all cases of people 40 or over, diagnosed with laryngeal cancer between 2000 and 2009, who had a record of a consultation with a GP in the year before their diagnosis. They then matched them with up to 5 patients from the same practice, of the same age and sex.

The researchers conducted a literature search and looked on patient forums to find any symptoms that had previously been linked to laryngeal cancer. They focused on 10 commonly reported symptoms, then looked for reports of these symptoms in the records of the people in the study, to see how often they’d been reported to GPs by people with or without laryngeal cancer.

The researchers used the data to calculate the positive predictive value of symptoms alone or in combination. Positive predictive value tells you what percentage of people with that symptom have the disease in question. Importantly, the calculation was done for people aged over 60, because there were few people with laryngeal cancer in younger age groups.

What were the basic results?

The study confirmed that hoarseness is the single symptom most closely linked with laryngeal cancer. 52% of people diagnosed with laryngeal cancer had reported hoarseness in the year before diagnosis, compared to 0.25% of people without cancer.

The researchers calculated that 2.7% of people over 60 reporting hoarseness would have laryngeal cancer. No other symptom was as strongly linked to cancer on its own. However, other combinations of symptoms did raise the risk. For people over 60 with hoarseness, the likelihood of cancer rose further if they also had insomnia (5.2% of people with both symptoms having cancer), persistent shortness of breath (7.9% of people), mouth symptoms (4.1%), blood tests that showed inflammation (15%), earache (6.3%), difficulty swallowing (3.5%), or persistent sore throat (12%).

For people over 60 without hoarseness, 3% or more of people with the following combination of symptoms were found to have laryngeal cancer:

persistent sore throat with: shortness of breath (4.1%), blood tests showing inflammation (3%), persistent chest infection (3%), earache (3%), difficulty swallowing (4.1%)

sore throat with: shortness of breath (5.2%), earache (6.3%) or difficulty swallowing (6.9%)

difficulty swallowing with earache (3%)

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers said: “These results provide new evidence that GPs should consider relevant when ascertaining whether to refer a patient for suspected laryngeal cancer.”

They point out that chances of laryngeal cancer “rose considerably” when hoarseness thought to be down to an infection persisted, and say GPs should “encourage re-attendance should the hoarseness persist”.

Conclusion

This study provides useful information for GPs about which symptoms, together or in isolation, might warrant a referral for investigation for possible laryngeal cancer.

The study has some limitations. The researchers relied on the GPs to record symptoms accurately and consistently, and say they may have missed some symptoms recorded in free text boxes rather than coded separately. People diagnosed with laryngeal cancer saw GPs more often, so had more chance to report symptoms. That means some people without cancer may have had symptoms such as sore throat, but did not report them. This could slightly overestimate the risk attached to symptoms.

The research provides new evidence to help GPs weigh up which patients may need referral for investigation, and which should be followed up to ensure their symptoms resolve. Even then, the study authors make the point that selecting the right patients for investigation of possible cancer “is not simply a matter of totting up symptoms and PPVs (positive predictive values)”. They say GPs’ clinical experience is also important for making these decisions.

However, there’s no need to panic if you get a sore throat. The vast majority of sore throats are caused by colds or infections. They pass quickly and often need no treatment. Sore throats, ear aches and other symptoms of infection are particularly common in children and young people. Even among older adults, the proportion of people with a sore throat or other symptoms who will be found to have laryngeal cancer is still very low.

However, people should get persistent symptoms – alone or in combination – checked out, especially if they last longer than you’d expect from a cold or chest infection.

Analysis by Bazian
Edited by NHS Website

Are we too reliant on on antibiotics? Find out in our interview with Dr Martin Duerden.

Dr Martin Duerden

Dr Martin Duerden

When faced with a cold or sore throat are we too ready to reach for antibiotics as a prefered treatment? What are the alternatives? How effective are they?

PatientTalk.Org interviewed Dr Martin Duerden , a UK based primary care physician, university lecturer, and Clinical Advisor in prescribing for the UK Royal College of General Practitioners.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- It is estimated that 1.6 million unnecessarily antibiotic prescriptions are issued each year in the UK. This survey of pharmacy staff sees the vast majority say there needs to be improved awareness of unnecessarily antibiotic use especially in upper respiratory tract infections such as sore throats and colds. So Dr Martin what do antibiotics actually do?

DR DUERDEN- Well antibiotics are drugs that either kill bacteria or stop them multiplying and bacteria can invade your body and they help to prevent that happening. They have to be used alongside your immune system and generally people who are fit and healthy antibiotics aren’t necessary for most types of infections because your immune system deals with those infections. What this survey n showed was that for things like respiratory tract infections sore throats, coughs and colds, there really isn’t a need to go see your GP and 90% of the pharmacy staff questioned felt that patients were going along to their GP or felt that they needed antibiotics when those weren’t necessary.

The reason why they are not necessary is because they are caused by viruses and viruses do not respond to antibiotic. It makes no difference. Sometimes you get secondary infections related to the virus and that’s where antibiotics sometimes have a place but for the vast majority of coughs, colds and sore throats there’s no need to have an antibiotic. The problem is we have got used to having them. We tend to go see our GP. We tend to expect them and the GP unfortunately finds it very difficult, sometimes the only way, the best way, well they feel the easier way deal with it is to issue a prescription but that is the wrong way.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- Is there really a risk of superbugs?

DR DUERDEN- It’s a real risk and that is part of the message we are trying to get across. Today is European Antibiotic Awareness Day and what we are trying to raise is that we must campaign against unnecessary antibiotic use and the reason for that is because the more antibiotics we use the more bacteria becomes resistant to those drugs. Bacteria are very clever things and they develop resistance and we over use them we are going to run out of them and if we run out of them then simple things that we thought were curable will no longer be curable things like pneumonia, things like meningitis, will have to change the way we do modern medicine. So people won’t be able to have hip operations or knee operation. They might not be able to have chemotherapy for cancer. They may not be able to have organ transplants simply because we won’t have an antibiotic to use in that context. This is a real threat we really do have to stop unnecessary use and conserve the antibiotics we have got so they don’t develop antibiotic resistance.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- How effective are antibiotics against infections like MRSA?

DR DUERDEN- At the moment we are quite lucky that we can treat a lot of MRSA. That is Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Multiple Staphylococcus. MRSA in the UK has become less of an issue in the last decade or so because we have developed very good techniques for infection control processes within hospitals. That is rigorous attention to washing your hands and keeping things as clean as possible. Now the catch is if we do have to treat those bugs at the moment we have to use drugs that themselves are unusual, last resort drugs they tend to have toxic effects and they can be problematic. The problem is that MRSA indicates those bugs that used to respond to simple penicillin antibiotics no longer respond to those simple antibiotics we have to use to those more difficult ones. There is another point there that the reason that resistance is such a challenge is that we are running out of antibiotics. No new classes of antibiotics have been developed in the last couple of decades and if we don’t have new antibiotics coming along then sooner or later these new infections will become really troublesome.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- What are the alternatives to antibiotics and how would they work?

DR DUERDEN- Well the main place for using those alternatives is when you have self-limiting cough or cold or sore throat and they are highly effective. They are much more effective than antibiotics which really make no difference in that context so for the vast majority of people who are relatively healthy if they have got a cough or a cold or a sore throat they really should treat themselves or go to their pharmacy and get interventions that can be used to relieve their symptoms. They should not think they need an antibiotic. If they think they need advice on how best to manage the problem then they should go to their community pharmacist who can advise them what systemic interventions can be used but they can also advise them in the very unusual instances where they might need to go and see their doctor. They will direct them to their doctor and I think that is a much better to deal with this issue. So the alternatives are things like pain killers which will levitate the aches and pains of having a cough, cold or sore throat. It will also help reduce the fever and you can also use things like cough medicines and anti-septic lozenges are very good at soothing a sore throat so those very simple interventions are much better than thinking or believing an antibiotic is necessary. Antibiotics don’t work. They cause side effects in those instances and they should only be used if they are strictly necessary.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- So as it stands why is the medical profession so poor at providing alternatives?

DR DUERDEN- I think that is a really complicated issue and its developed over several decades really since antibiotics first came along in 1950 and at that time antibiotics were lifesaving and there was this real view that antibiotics had a really important place and they did at that stage but as time has gone along we’ve become almost dependent on them since we rely on antibiotics. In most instances they are not necessary so patient experience has been that when they have these problems they get an antibiotic. Patients also believe that there should be a cure for all ill’s and modern medicine seems to suggest that might be the case but the problem is viruses do not respond to that treatment and there isn’t any treatment that will help to affect the virus and when patients turn up at the GP surgery, GP’s are going to be very busy. They tend to be nice people. They don’t like confronting their patients and they tend to be rather cautious. It seems reasonable to give a patient any antibiotic in that instance and in the past it’s been felt that antibiotics are harmless but antibiotics are not harmless. The reasons I’ve just described they cause resistance and if we give an antibiotic to one person then we are scuppering the chances of treating future people so it’s really important that message gets across. Also, antibiotics, if you give them to people with self-limiting conditions they cause more harm than benefits. They cause things like diarrhoea. They can cause nausea and vomiting. They can cause a rash and adverse effects can be more troublesome so they are not harmless and we really need to change both what GP’s do in terms of prescribing them but how patients and the public if you like, relate to antibiotics. They should not see them as something that can be used for self-limiting infections. In general they have to be preserved for severe infections and for times when antibiotics are strictly necessary.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- Do you think Med Ed could play a role?

DR DUERDEN- I think it’s really important, Medical Education is all part of this and certainly there is quite a lot of evidence. There was a good research project and published paper from Cardiff University a few years ago which showed that you can improve the ways that GP’s communicate with patients and provide the right kind of information to patients to help make a decision not to use antibiotics and to avoid confrontation and so I think there is a lot of work that needs to be done with prescribers to improve our understanding of antibiotics but also to improve our communication of the risks and benefits of using antibiotics. I think there is also a really important role for education with pharmacy staff as well although pharmacy staff are generally well trained but we can provide things like decision aids information for community pharmacists which they themselves can use with patients to help convey some of the problems that I’ve been describing to you.

PATIENTTALK.ORG- Regarding the research what methodology was used?

DR DUERDEN- Well it was simple survey of pharmacy staff. Two thirds of the people questioned, and they were 143 pharmacy staff questioned, two thirds of those people were pharmacists and basically it was asking them their opinion of antibiotic was and how they should be used. It was clear from that research that they felt the understanding of antibiotic resistance and overuse of antibiotics had not really got across to the general public and we needed to improve on that. They strongly believed, 58% of those asked, felt we should always try systemic treatments before using antibiotics. Pharmacists themselves are well switched onto this message and really do need to harness their role within this conundrum so the message is that as much as possible most patients do not need to go see their GP or their out of hours service or their A&E department. What they should be doing is either treating themselves, maybe reading up on information from things like the internet. NHS Choices have some fantastic information. If they feel that they need further advice they should go talk to their pharmacist and the pharmacist can always advise if necessary that the patient then goes and see the GP but you shouldn’t go straight to your GP with these problems. We all have coughs and colds we know they get better. We know we shouldn’t be expecting a quick fix.

Background

The interview took part on European Antibiotic Awareness Day.

• It is estimated that 1.6 million unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions are issued each year in the UK2
• Survey of pharmacy staff sees vast majority say there needs to be improved awareness of unnecessary antibiotic use especially in relation to upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) such as sore throats and colds 1
• Over a third (35%) of those surveyed claim the majority of their customers seek antibiotics as a ‘go to’ treatment for URTIs before seeking advice from their pharmacy 1
More than 90% of pharmacy staff questioned believe there is a need for improved awareness of unnecessary antibiotic use 1

That’s according to new research which also saw over half (59%) say alternative options for symptomatic relief of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), such as sore throats and cold and flu, should always be tried before antibiotics. 1

Despite this, only a third (38%) of the pharmacy staff talk to their customers about alternative options for symptomatic relief for URTIs.1

It is estimated that 1.6 million unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions are issued each year in the UK.2

For pharmacy staff, recommending non-antibiotic treatment for URTIs is a challenge. Once antibiotics have been prescribed by GPs previously, pharmacy staff understandably find it difficult to convince patients that symptomatic relief is a credible and effective treatment option – and an alternative to antibiotics.

Those surveyed also showed a hesitance in questioning the GP’s assessment, 11% would advise customers that their GP knows best.1 Many patients also see antibiotics as the best solution: over a third (35%) of those surveyed claim the majority of their customers seek antibiotics as a ‘go to’ treatment for URTIs before seeking advice from their pharmacy.1

In the majority of patients, URTIs are of viral aetiology and do not benefit from antibiotics. According to Global Respiratory Infection Partnership (GRIP), antibiotics will not relieve the symptoms of most colds, sore throats, earaches or coughs. In most cases symptomatic treatments are effective and more appropriate at providing symptomatic relief.

References:
1. Survey of 143 pharmacy staff. One in three respondents work in a single shop independent or a small chain of five or fewer branches. Strategic Development Resources Ltd. October 2014
2. Professor Dame Sally Davies. Antimicrobial resistance – why the irresponsible use of antibiotics in agriculture must stop, 2014
3. Arroll B, Kenealy T. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3) CD000247.
4. Van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:490–497.
5. Hildreth CJ, et al. JAMA. 2009;302:816.
6. NICE Clinical Guideline 69. 2008. Accessed 02 April 2013. Link: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG69/NICEGuidance. P13
7. Benrijom SL et al. Clin Drug Invest 2001;21:183-93