Cardiac arrest survival rate rising

Araz Rawshani

Araz Rawshani, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg CREDIT Photo by Charlotta Sjöstedt

The probability of surviving sudden cardiac arrest outside hospital has more than doubled in 30 years. This is shown by a national Swedish register study covering more than 130,000 cases.

Sudden cardiac arrest affects some 10,000 people in Sweden annually. Saving them is a race against the clock, and the actions of bystanders who can perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use a defibrillator are entirely crucial. Three in four events occur as people go about their everyday lives, while only one in four takes place in hospital.

The outcome of sudden cardiac arrest is usually fatal, regardless of where it happens. The condition is also the most common cause of death for people with diabetes, heart failure, or coronary artery disease, making it a widespread form of ill-health.

The current study, published in the European Heart Journal, includes data from the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry on 106,296 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the years 1990–2020. The study also includes data on 30,032 in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) cases in the period 2004–2020.

Three decades of development

Araz Rawshani, a researcher at Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg and a specialist doctor at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, is the corresponding author of the study.

“This is a comprehensive study that describes care and survival following sudden cardiac arrest. It’s a detailed report that clarifies three decades’ resuscitation in Sweden as a whole, and it shows that the situation has been changing rapidly for patients and the care providers alike,” he notes.

The findings show that for OHCA, survival more than doubled in 1990–2020 to approximately 11 percent. This whole improvement occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and that no further rise in survival has taken place over the past decade.

For IHCA, survival rose by a factor of 1.2 in the period from 2004 to 2020, reaching about 35 percent. This improvement occurred largely from 2010 on and, according to the researchers, was due to better skills and resources in healthcare.

“In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest,” Rawshani says, “the rise in the number of people trained to perform CPR is probably the driver of that positive trend. Millions of Swedes have been trained in this vital skill, which can come in useful at any time, and these people intervene ever more often. Today, nonprofessionals (bystanders) start the CPR in the majority of all cases of cardiac arrest outside a hospital.”

Ambulance delays, more difficult cases

“The upward trend of out-of-hospital survival came to an end for several reasons,” Rawshani continues. “First, the ambulances aren’t managing to arrive in time for the patients; the delays in getting to them have constantly increased. Second, the proportion of patients who are relatively easy to resuscitate ­­­­— that is, those whose heart stops because of acute or chronic coronary artery disease ­­­­— has fallen dramatically in the past few decades.”

The fact that hard-to-treat cases ­­­­— with cardiac arrests caused by lung disease or heart failure, for example — are a growing category means that successful resuscitation will become harder to achieve in the future. What is more, women are overrepresented in this category, which explains the survival gap between the sexes. In 2020 almost 14 percent of the men, against some 8 percent of the women, survived OHCA.

“The study indicates that health care, from the emergency measures taken by paramedics to post-resuscitation nursing, is set to face new and daunting challenges in the years ahead, with a patient population who will get increasingly difficult to resuscitate.

“Further improvements in survival call for new ways of training considerably more people in cardiopulmonary resuscitation; maintenance of expertise; and the requisite technical advances to deliver defibrillators earlier,” Rawshani concludes.

Smoking is even more damaging to the heart than previously thought

Smokers have weaker hearts than non-smokers,according to research presented at ESC Congress 2022.1 The study found that the more people smoked, the worse their heart function became. Some function was restored when people kicked the habit.

“It is well known that smoking causes blocked arteries, leading to coronary heart disease and stroke,” said study author Dr. Eva Holt of Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. “Our study shows that smoking also leads to thicker, weaker hearts. It means that smokers have a smaller volume of blood in the left heart chamber and less power to pump it out to the rest of the body. The more you smoke, the worse your heart function becomes. The heart can recuperate to some degree with smoking cessation, so it is never too late to quit.”

According to the World Health Organization, tobacco kills more than eight million people each year.2 Cigarette smoking is responsible for 50% of all avoidable deaths in smokers, with half of these due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack and stroke.3 The detrimental effects of smoking on the arteries and arterial diseases such as heart attack and stroke are well established.4

Studies have also shown that smoking is associated with a higher risk of heart failure, where the heart muscle does not pump blood around the body as well as it should, usually because it is too weak or stiff. This means that the body does not receive the oxygen and nutrients it needs to work normally. The link between smoking and heart structure and function has not been fully examined. This study therefore explored whether smoking was related to changes in the structure and function of the heart in people without cardiovascular disease, and the effect of changing smoking habits.

The study used data from the 5th Copenhagen City Heart Study which investigated cardiovascular risk factors and diseases in the general population. A total of 3,874 participants aged 20 to 99 years without heart disease were enrolled. A self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain information on smoking history and to estimate pack-years, which is the number of cigarettes smoked through life. One pack-year is defined as 20 cigarettes smoked every day for one year.

Participants had an ultrasound of the heart, called echocardiography, which provides information about its structure and how well it is working. The researchers compared the echocardiography measures of current smokers versus never smokers after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes and lung function.

The average age of participants was 56 years and 43% were women. Nearly one in five participants were current smokers (18.6%), while 40.9% were former smokers and 40.5% had never smoked. Compared to never smokers, current smokers had thicker, weaker and heavier hearts. Increasing pack-years were associated with pumping less blood. Dr. Holt explained: “We found that current smoking and accumulated pack-years were associated with worsening of the structure and function of the left heart chamber – the most important part of the heart. Furthermore, we found that over a 10-year period, those who continued smoking developed thicker, heavier and weaker hearts that were less able to pump blood compared to never smokers and those who quit during that time.”

She concluded: “Our study indicates that smoking not only damages the blood vessels but also directly harms the heart. The good news is that some of the damage is reversible by giving up.”

Women are urged to eat potassium-rich foods to improve their heart health

Traumatic brain injury


Women who eat bananas, avocados and salmon could reduce the negative effects of salt in the diet, according to a study published today in European Heart Journal, a journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).1 The study found that potassium-rich diets were associated with lower blood pressure, particularly in women with high salt intake.

“It is well known that high salt consumption is associated with elevated blood pressure and a raised risk of heart attacks and strokes,” said study author Professor Liffert Vogt of Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands. “Health advice has focused on limiting salt intake but this is difficult to achieve when our diets include processed foods. Potassium helps the body excrete more sodium in the urine. In our study, dietary potassium was linked with the greatest health gains in women.”

The study included 24,963 participants (11,267 men and 13,696 women) of the EPIC-Norfolk study, which recruited 40 to 79 year olds from general practices in Norfolk, UK, between 1993 and 1997. The average age was 59 years for men and 58 years for women. Participants completed a questionnaire on lifestyle habits, blood pressure was measured, and a urine sample was collected. Urinary sodium and potassium were used to estimate dietary intake. Participants were divided into tertiles according to sodium intake (low/medium/high) and potassium intake (low/medium/high).

The researchers analysed the association between potassium intake and blood pressure after adjusting for age, sex and sodium intake. Potassium consumption (in grams per day) was associated with blood pressure in women – as intake went up, blood pressure went down. When the association was analysed according to sodium intake (low/medium/high), the relationship between potassium and blood pressure was only observed in women with high sodium intake, where every 1 gram increase in daily potassium was associated with a 2.4 mmHg lower systolic blood pressure. In men, there was no association between potassium and blood pressure.

During a median follow-up of 19.5 years, 13,596 (55%) participants were hospitalised or died due to cardiovascular disease. The researchers analysed the association between potassium intake and cardiovascular events after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, sodium intake, use of lipid lowering drugs, smoking, alcohol intake, diabetes and prior heart attack or stroke. In the overall cohort, people in the highest tertile of potassium intake had a 13% lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to those in the lowest tertile. When men and women were analysed separately, the corresponding risk reductions were 7% and 11%, respectively. The amount of salt in the diet did not influence the relationship between potassium and cardiovascular events in men or women.

Professor Vogt said: “The results suggest that potassium helps preserve heart health, but that women benefit more than men. The relationship between potassium and cardiovascular events was the same regardless of salt intake, suggesting that potassium has other ways of protecting the heart on top of increasing sodium excretion.”

The World Health Organization recommends that adults consume at least 3.5 grams of potassium and less than 2 grams of sodium (5 grams of salt) per day.2 High potassium foods include vegetables, fruit, nuts, beans, dairy products and fish. For example, a 115 gram banana has 375 mg of potassium, 154 grams of cooked salmon has 780 mg, a 136 gram potato has 500 mg, and 1 cup of milk has 375 mg.

Professor Vogt concluded: “Our findings indicate that a heart healthy diet goes beyond limiting salt to boosting potassium content. Food companies can help by swapping standard sodium-based salt for a potassium salt alternative in processed foods. On top of that, we should all prioritise fresh, unprocessed foods since they are both rich in potassium and low in salt.”

New light on the association between diabetes and heart valve disease

Rheumatoid arthritis linked to irregular heart rhythm
Rheumatoid arthritis linked to irregular heart rhythm


Individuals with diabetes display a substantially increased risk of disease in left-sided heart valves compared to controls without diabetes, a comprehensive register study at the University of Gothenburg shows. The statistical analyses also indicate that valvular heart disease can be prevented by lowering blood pressure and reducing other risk factors even more than current treatment targets.

Four heart valves serve to make the blood go in the right direction. Since the pressure is highest on the left side of the heart, valve disease most often affects these two valves. This may have two effects: The valves lose their suppleness and may no longer close- or open sufficiently, and regurgitation (backflow) occurs, impairing the heart’s pumping capacity. Valve (valvular) disease can cause many problems, such as labored breathing, fatigue, dizziness, and at worst heart failure.

Distinctly elevated valve-disease risk

Other research, on animal models, has shown that diabetes may exacerbate hardening of valves in the heart and in the rings attaching the valves to the heart. At population level, this study shows for the first time how distinct the connection is between diabetes and the increased risk of valve disease. Both individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at a higher risk of developing it and, for the latter, the risk of calcification in the aortic valve (aortic stenosis) is 1.62 times higher than for controls without diabetes.

Lower regurgitation risk

On the other hand, a relatively low risk of regurgitation was found in people with type 2 diabetes. However, although this finding may be interpreted as a protective effect, the researchers say it is presumably not positive.

“The lower risk of primary regurgitation (or backward flow) in type 2 diabetes is also caused by the presumed process of hardening and calcification that’s started by, for instance, high blood pressure, impaired blood-sugar metabolism, and factors linked to obesity. As we age, the hardening process in the heart occurs in all of us — even in individuals without diabetes — but we assume that diabetes accelerates it,” says Aidin Rawshani, the study’s lead author, who is a researcher at the University of Gothenburg’s Sahlgrenska Academy and doctor at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.

The study is based on register data concerning just over 3.4 million people in Sweden, followed up over 20 years. The results are published in the scientific journal Circulation.

Optimal treatment targets

The study identifies blood sugar, blood pressure, blood lipids, obesity, and kidney function as specific factors affecting risks of left-sided heart-valve disease. The statistical analysis shows that it might be beneficial if more of the traditional risk factors were reduced even further, compared with current healthcare guidelines. However, the finding is purely statistical, as the researchers behind the study emphasize.

“Our results suggest that heart-valve disease risk could be reduced if the recommended treatment targets were lowered. But this finding must be interpreted with caution since it’s no more than a statistical association so far. Clinical trials are needed to verify that the effect is genuinely as beneficial as the statistics suggest,” Rawshani says.

Degenerative valve disease and diabetes

The study also showed that diabetics whose blood sugar, blood pressure, blood fats (lipids), body mass index (BMI), and kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) were within the therapeutic target range had a persistently high risk of hardening in left-sided valves, while their regurgitation risk of suction was markedly low, compared with controls. Various sensitivity analyses yielded more findings of interest, such as the markedly elevated risk of degenerative left-sided valve disease among people with diabetes. This supports the hypothesis that it is a degenerative process in the valve ring that contributes to the lower risk of valve regurgitation observed in diabetics.

The study includes data, collected over 20 years, on just over 3.4 million people in Sweden. They included 36,211 type 1 and 678,932 type 2 diabetics. The data were collected from four national Swedish registers: the Diabetes Register, Patient Register, Cause of Death Register, and Prescribed Drug Register. Statistics Sweden (SCB) provided matched controls and access to the Longitudinal Integrated Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies (LISA).

More results from the study: Compared with individuals without diabetes,

  • People with type 2 diabetes have a risk of aortic stenosis (hardening of the aortic valve) 1.62 times, and a risk of mitral stenosis (hardening of the mitral valve) 2.28 times, higher.
    • People with type 1 diabetes have a risk of aortic stenosis 2.59 times, and a risk of mitral stenosis 11.43 times, higher.
    • Type 1 diabetics have a risk of mitral regurgitation 1.38 times higher.
    • For people with type 2 diabetes, the risk of regurgitation is slightly lower. The risk of primary regurgitation in the aortic and the mitral valve is 19 and 5 percent lower, respectively.
    • Even with optimal control of risk factors, type 2 diabetics have a risk of aortic stenosis 1.34 times higher, and a risk of mitral stenosis 1.95 times higher, while their risks of aortic and mitral regurgitation are 33 and 18 percent lower, respectively.
    • Type 2 diabetics have a risk of degenerative mitral stenosis 2.27 times higher, while type 1 diabetics have a risk 21.72 times higher. Systolic blood pressure and BMI shows the clearest risk association with left-sided valve diseases.
    • In people with type 1 diabetes and optimal risk-factor control, the risk of aortic stenosis is 2.01 times higher and that of mitral stenosis 3.47 times higher.

All physicians should know the benefits of plant-based diets for these six health conditions

Plant based food
Plant based food


new commentary in the American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine says that all physicians should be aware of the benefits of a plant-based diet for six health conditions: weight loss and maintenance, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, and COVID-19.

“The field of medicine, despite its prominent influence in society, has invested little to promote healthy lifestyle choices,” says the commentary co-authored by Saray Stancic, MD, FACLM, director of medical education for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. “The consequence of this is reflected in our ever-rising chronic disease statistics, most notably obesity and diabetes rates.”

Part of the problem, say the authors, is that “medical schools offer an anemic number of hours of nutrition education over 4 years,” which does not improve in postgraduate training. They note than in a recent survey of more than 600 cardiologists, 90% reported they had not received needed nutrition education during training.

The commentary acknowledges that not all physicians must be experts in nutrition, but says that they should at least have rudimentary knowledge of the benefits of a plant-based diet for these six conditions, for which they provide detailed evidence, including the following:

  1. Weight loss and maintenance. A study of 70,000 people that found those who consumed a vegan diet weighed about 9 pounds less than those who did not. They also had a reduced risk of death.
  2. Cardiovascular disease. Animal products are high in saturated fat and cholesterol, which are key drivers of cardiovascular disease. But a recent metanalysis found that those consuming a vegetarian diet decreased LDL “bad” cholesterol by 13 mg/dl. Another analysis found a 24% lower rate of heart disease deaths among vegetarians compared to omnivores.
  3. Cancer. Adopting healthy behaviors, which includeremaining physically active and consuming diets rich in vegetables, fruits, and whole grains, has the potential to reduce breast cancer risk by as much as 50-70%. Research also shows that diets that include soy and are high in fiber reduce breast cancer risk. Diets high in dairy products increase prostate cancer risk. High-fiber diets reduce colorectal cancer risk, while daily consumption of red and processed meat increases its risk.
  4. Diabetes. A Harvard study, which included participants from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, Nurses’ Health Study, and the Nurses’ Health Study II, concluded that those who consumed a plant-based diet could expect a 34% reduction in type 2 diabetes risk.
  5. Alzheimer’s disease. A study found that those who adhered to the primarily plant-based Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet, which is focused on brain-healthy foods such as green leafy vegetables, other vegetables, beans, berries, nuts, and whole grains, had a 60% lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease.
  6. COVID-19. Harvard’s smartphone-based COVID-19 study found that in those who consumed a primarily plant-based diet there was a 41% reduction in risk of severe COVID-19 as well as a 9% reduction in infection of any severity.

“It is time for all physicians across the globe to speak to the importance of diet and lifestyle in health,” concludes the commentary, which recommends that physicians do this by counseling patients, assuring hospitals provide healthy menus, lecturing in the community, writing articles, using social media, and providing commentary to media.